• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS LTD UNKN BIRMINGHAM HIP RESURFACING (BHR) HEAD; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/METAL, RESURFACING

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS LTD UNKN BIRMINGHAM HIP RESURFACING (BHR) HEAD; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/METAL, RESURFACING Back to Search Results
Catalog Number UNKNOWN
Device Problem Biocompatibility (2886)
Patient Problem Infiltration into Tissue (1931)
Event Date 07/21/2021
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Internal complaint reference: (b)(4).Su, e.P., ho, h., bhal, v., housman, l.R., masonis, j.L., noble jr, j.W., & engh jr, c.A.(2021).Results of the first us fda-approved hip resurfacing device at 10-year follow-up.Jbjs, 103(14), 1303-1311.Doi: 10.2106/jbjs.20.01886.
 
Event Description
It was reported that, on literature review "results of the first u.S fda-approved hip resufacing device at 10 year follow-up.", the number of patients who initially underwent primary implantation of a bhr resurfacing construct and that experienced post-operative cobalt and/or chromium levels in blood greater than seven (7) parts per billion remained similar over time: seven (7) out of two hundred five (205) showed evidence of these levels at one (1) year after the initial surgery, and nine (9) patients out of two hundred four (204) showed evidence during the ten (10) post-operative year follow up.Although it is unknown how this event was addressed on each patient, a revision surgery was not required.Further information was not provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H3, h6.It was reported that, on literature review "results of the first u.S fda - approved hip resufacing device at ten - year follow - up.", the number of patients who initially underwent primary implantation of a bhr resurfacing construct and that experienced post-operative cobalt and/or chromium levels in blood greater than seven parts per billion remained similar over time: seven out of two hundred five showed evidence of these levels at one year after the initial surgery, and nine patients out of two hundred four showed evidence during the ten post-operative year follow up.Although it is unknown how this event was addressed on each patient, a revision surgery was not required.Therefore the devices, used in treatment, were not available for analysis.As no device part and batch numbers were provided for investigation, a complaint history review, manufacturing record review, device labelling / ifu review could not be performed.If more information is received, this investigation will be reopened.A review of historic escalation actions related to the products and similar complaint events was performed.Following the review, prior applicable escalation actions were identified and confirmed to reduce associated risks as far as possible.No further escalation actions are required.A risk management review was performed for the acetabular cup and femoral head.The alleged failure modes and associated risks have been anticipated within the risk file and the anticipated risk level is still adequate.No further actions are required at this time.Without clinically relevant patient-specific supporting documentation, a thorough medical investigation could not be performed.The root cause and/or patient outcome beyond that which was documented in the article could not be confirmed nor concluded; therefore, no further medical assessment is warranted at this time.Should additional medical information be provided this complaint will be re-assessed.Without return of the actual devices or further information we cannot further investigate the details supplied in this complaint, our investigation remains inconclusive, and a definitive root cause cannot be determined.Based on the limited information provided we are unable to speculate on specific factors known to contribute to the alleged fault.If the products or additional information become available in the future, this case will be reopened.No preventative or corrective action has been initiated as a result of this investigation.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UNKN BIRMINGHAM HIP RESURFACING (BHR) HEAD
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/METAL, RESURFACING
Manufacturer (Section D)
SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS LTD
aurora house, spa park
leamington spa warwickshire CV31 3HL
UK  CV31 3HL
Manufacturer (Section G)
SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS LTD
aurora house, spa park
leamington spa warwickshire CV31 3HL
UK   CV31 3HL
Manufacturer Contact
holly topping
7000 west william cannon drive
austin, TX 78735
5123913905
MDR Report Key14743765
MDR Text Key294941333
Report Number3005975929-2022-00403
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NXT
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Literature,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 07/18/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received06/20/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received07/15/2022
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-