The log file of the affected device was analysed for investigation.Based on the log file an unexpected, synchronized restart of the ventilation unit and the display unit on the date of event could be confirmed.The restart was initiated in reaction to a ram memory corruption.The printed circuit board used as the central processing unit to control and monitor the device was replaced and send in for detailed examination.The replaced part was undergoing a functional test and ram memory stress test as well as an endurance test in an independent laboratory ventilator for 29 days.These tests revealed no deviation from the specification.A restart of the device could not be reproduced during the endurance test.Consequently, the root cause of the identified ram memory corruption could not be conclusively clarified.The device reacted as specified on detecting a ram memory corruption by triggering a synchronized restart of the ventilation unit and the display unit in order to reset the system to a specified state.During restart sequence, the ventilation is temporarily interrupted, and the safety valve is opened to the ambient allowing the patient to breathe spontaneously.The device alerted the situation as intended and resumed the ventilation after restarting with the last settings.In this case no patient consequences were reported.The number of similar cases, related to the same root cause, is within the expected range of the respective risk assessment and thus accepted.
|