Two new alarms were recorded in the driver's alarm history, first fault code is likely the alarm produced by the reported event, and the second fault code occurs as a result of secondary motor engagement.No evidence of secondary motor engagement was observed, this alarm was likely produced in house during alarm history data extraction prior to functional testing.The first fault code alarm is produced because of a change in voltage detected during operation of the driver which can occur due to shaking or impact to the driver or a sudden peak in the primary motor's current can cause this alarm.Visual inspection of external components found there was a missing rubber foot on the front housing right side, a broken fan cover, a broken display cover, cracked rear housing, and a stain on air filter origin unknown.Visual inspection of internal components revealed grease stain on primary motor which is cosmetic in nature and does not impact functionality.Freedom driver passed all incoming functional testing.In an attempt to reproduce the reported alarm, a battery exchange test was performed on the driver and a new alarm was produced.This new alarm is expected when performing a battery exchange test.The first alarm fault code could not be duplicated.A 72 hour observation run at normotensive settings was performed to try and reproduce the first fault alarm.Testing was not able to replicate the condition, no fault alarms occurred during the observation test.Failure investigation for this complaint confirmed the reported issue via alarm history data review.The first fault code alarm was not replicated via functional testing nor observational testing and there was no evidence of a device malfunction.The root cause of the fault alarms could not be conclusively determined.Failure investigation identified damage and abnormalities that could have contributed to the patient reported fault alarms.Driver functioned as intended.(b)(4).Follow-up report 1.
|