• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION MEDTRONIC SURGICAL TISSUE VALVE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION MEDTRONIC SURGICAL TISSUE VALVE Back to Search Results
Model Number MDT-TISSUE VALVE
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Stroke/CVA (1770); Non specific EKG/ECG Changes (1817); Endocarditis (1834); Hemorrhage/Bleeding (1888); Myocardial Infarction (1969); Aortic Valve Insufficiency/ Regurgitation (4450); Insufficient Information (4580)
Event Date 05/17/2022
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Citation: toff wd.Et al.Effect of transcatheter aortic valve implantation vs surgical aortic valve replacement on all-cause mortality in patients with aortic stenosis: a randomized clinical trial.Jama.2022 may 17;327(19):1875-1887.Doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.5776 earliest date of publish used for date of event.No unique device identifier (serial/lot) numbers were provided; without this information it could not be determined whether these observations have been previously reported.Without return of the product no definitive conclusion can be made regarding the clinical observations.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Medtronic received information via literature regarding the effect of transcatheter aortic valve (tav) replacement versus surgical aortic valve (sav) replacement on all-cause mortality.All data were collected in a multi-center randomized trial between 2014 and 2019.The study population included 913 patients who were predominantly male with a mean age of 81 years.Multiple manufacturer¿s devices were implanted in the study population.Thirty-eight patients were implanted with a medtronic corevalve, 8 with an evolutr, and 10 with an evolutpro tav.Among all patients implanted with a sav, 38 received an unspecified medtronic valve.The remaining patients were implanted with a non-medtronic tav or sav.No unique device identifier numbers were provided.Among all patients, adverse events included: conduction disturbances treated with the implant of a permanent pacemaker, mild to moderate aortic regurgitation, major bleeding, endocarditis, vascular complications, myocardial infarction (mi), non-fatal cerebral vascular accident (cva), aortic valve reintervention and unspecified reintervention.Based on the available information medtronic product may have been associated with the adverse events.No additional adverse patient effects or product performance issues were reported.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MEDTRONIC SURGICAL TISSUE VALVE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION
1851 e. deere ave.
santa ana CA 92705
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION
1851 e. deere ave.
santa ana CA 92705
Manufacturer Contact
alison sweeney
parkmore business park west
galway 
EI  
091708096
MDR Report Key14954571
MDR Text Key295474836
Report Number2025587-2022-01869
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LWR
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUK
PMA/PMN Number
P970031
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Literature,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 07/08/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received07/08/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberMDT-TISSUE VALVE
Device Catalogue NumberMDT-TISSUE VALVE
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received06/15/2022
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Life Threatening; Required Intervention;
Patient Age81 YR
Patient SexMale
Patient RaceWhite
-
-