Catalog Number UNK XIENCE V |
Device Problem
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problems
Stroke/CVA (1770); Hemorrhage/Bleeding (1888); Myocardial Infarction (1969); Thrombosis/Thrombus (4440)
|
Event Date 05/01/2020 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
This report is filed for all adverse events except death it was reported through an article from china: a total of 2,655 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (pci) were included and divided into two groups according to the type of stent: zes group (n = 1,637) and ees group (n = 1,018).The primary endpoint at 2-year follow-up was major adverse cardiovascular events (mace), including death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization.According to the type of stent implanted: zes group (endeavor resolute stent, medtronic, usa; n = 1,637) and ees group (xience v stent, abbott, usa; n = 1,018).Patients implanted with an ees (everolimus-eluting stent) had a mace of 4.9%, death of 0.5%, non-fatal myocardial infarction of 1.2%, stroke of 1.6%, repeat revascularization of 6.7%, stent thrombosis of 0.6%, and bleeding of 7.3%.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Date of event ¿ estimated (b)(6) 2020.Treatment/therapy start date - estimated (b)(6) 2017.The unique device identifier (udi) is unknown because the part number and lot number were not provided.Date of implant ¿ estimated (b)(6) 2017.The device was not returned for evaluation.A review of the lot history record and complaint history of the reported lot could not be conducted because the part and lot numbers were not provided.The reported patient effects of myocardial infarction, thrombosis/thrombus, cerebrovascular accident, and hemorrhage (bleeding complications) are listed in the xience v everolimus eluting coronary stent systems instructions for use (ifu) as known patient effects of coronary stenting procedures.A conclusive cause for the reported myocardial infarction, thrombosis/thrombus, cerebrovascular accident, and hemorrhage, and their relationship to the product, if any, cannot be determined; however, the subsequent unexpected medical intervention appears to be related to the operational context of the procedure.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design, or labeling.The patient effect of death reported and the article is captured under a separate medwatch report.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|