• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COVIDIEN PROTEGE RX CAROTID STENT SYSTEM; STENT, CAROTID

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COVIDIEN PROTEGE RX CAROTID STENT SYSTEM; STENT, CAROTID Back to Search Results
Catalog Number SEPX-8-6-40-135
Device Problem Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem (2906)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 06/28/2022
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Physician was attempting to use protégé rx self-expanding stent along with an embolic protection during procedure to treat a proximal common carotid artery with chronic total occlusion (cto-100%).The vessel was moderately tortuous and calcified with a diameter of 70mm containing plaque.There was no damage noted to packaging.There was no issue noted when removing the device from the hoop/tray.The device was prepped per ifu with no issues identified.The lesion was not pre dilated.There was no resistance encountered when advancing the device.The stent could not be deployed after reaching the lesion.Partial deployment of the stent occurred.The device was removed from the patient and the physician used another protégé rx self-expanding stent of the same model to complete the procedure.There was no patient injury.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Product analysis the device was received with the touhy-borst tight.The device was returned with approx.21mm of the stent exposed from the outside tip of the outer assembly, (photo 4) the stent confirmed as 40mm, (photo 3 & 9).A 20cc water filled syringe was used to flush the device without issue, on both annual spaces and inner lumen (photo 5).A 0.014¿ guidewire was loaded through the guidewire lumen without issue, and the device was loaded into a deployment fixture, (photo 6 <(><<)>(> <(>&<)><(><<)>)> 7).The stent was deployed, and the fixture reached 2.40lbs (below 3.00lbs, as per cprd-980008), (photo 8).The deployment figure achieved of 2.40lb most probably was affected by the amount of stent exposed before deployment.The deployed stent did not flower open as expected, upon a visual inspection of the stent there was dried biologics at approx.21mm of the stent, (photo 9 & 10).Image analysisstill image review one image was provided for evaluation: image one is a picture of the protégé rx device, showing the distal end of the device with a small part of the stent exposed.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PROTEGE RX CAROTID STENT SYSTEM
Type of Device
STENT, CAROTID
Manufacturer (Section D)
COVIDIEN
4600 nathan lane north
plymouth MN 55442
Manufacturer (Section G)
COVIDIEN
4600 nathan lane north
plymouth MN 55442
Manufacturer Contact
alison sweeney
parkmore business park west
galway 
EI  
091708096
MDR Report Key14984317
MDR Text Key304619084
Report Number2183870-2022-00229
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIM
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCH
PMA/PMN Number
P060001
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 10/07/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received07/12/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date09/08/2023
Device Catalogue NumberSEPX-8-6-40-135
Device Lot NumberB262151
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received10/07/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured09/08/2021
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age68 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-