• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ARJOHUNTLEIGH, A BRANCH OF ARJO LTD MED AB NIMBUS 3 / DFS3; MATTRESS, AIR FLOTATION, ALTERNATING PRESSURE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ARJOHUNTLEIGH, A BRANCH OF ARJO LTD MED AB NIMBUS 3 / DFS3; MATTRESS, AIR FLOTATION, ALTERNATING PRESSURE Back to Search Results
Model Number 151010
Device Problem Deflation Problem (1149)
Patient Problem Pressure Sores (2326)
Event Date 06/15/2022
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Please note that previous medwatch reports for this product may have been submitted under the following registration numbers: (b)(4).Currently, these products are to be handled by arjohuntleigh ab¿s complaint handling establishment and any medwatch reports will be submitted under registration (b)(4).On (b)(6) 2022, arjo was notified, at time of pick-up of the nimbus 3 system that a condition of patient¿s who was using the system had deteriorated due to alleged system breakdown (not pumping up, not alarming).The patient had documented history of deteriorating pressure injuries.At time of pick up the system, he had pressure injury category unstagable to sacrum and left buttock and category 2 to right buttock.He required a treatment with a careful hygiene regime, dressings and repositioning.During the investigation we have learnt that, the involved nimbus 3 system was installed on 31 may 2022 by the arjo representative.There were no breakdowns reported between 31 may 2022 up to 14 jun 2022.During the interview with the patient, he recalled being uncomfortable for hours through the night but he did not inform the nurses about it.The claimed system was evaluated.The pump was inspected and no fault was found.The inspection of the mattress revealed a leakage of air from the split connection between one of cells and the vent valves.According to technician assessment, it was impossible to determine if the part failed due to the age or if it was mechanically damaged.This system is equipped with a sophisticated alarm system which differentiates between normal operation and genuine system faults.The alarm system worked correctly, which means that if an alarm situation was detected an indicator would illuminate on the top and front of the pump and an audible warning would be heard.The alarm system activates after system detects lower pressure in the mattress.The instruction for use id.151996en states that one of the key factor in patient care is a patient¿s skin care management protocol and that if the patient¿s condition changes a therapy should be reviewed.¿the nimbus 3 systems are indicated for the prevention and management of all categories of pressure ulcer when combined with an individualised monitoring, repositioning and wound care programme.Systems represent one aspect of a pressure ulcer management strategy; if existing wounds do not improve or the patient¿s condition changes the overall therapy regimen should be reviewed by the prescribing clinician.¿ we were informed that the patient had pressure injuries before he was placed on the nimbus 3 system and that the patient's pressure ulcers had been deteriorating for the last few days.It is unknown whether the therapy regimen has been adapted to the changing condition of the patient¿s.Pressure injuries are complex and are a result of many factors including: advanced age, immobility, co-morbidities, microclimate, incontinence and lack of being turned or repositioned frequently enough.The arjo nimbus 3 system was used while the patient condition deteriorated, therefore it played role in the event.The involved system was malfunctioned therefore it failed to meet its performance specification.The complaint was assessed as reportable due to indication about the serious injury.
 
Event Description
On (b)(6) 2022, arjo was notified, at time of pick-up of the nimbus 3 system that a condition of patient¿s who was using the system had deteriorated due to alleged system breakdown (not pumping up, not alarming).The patient had documented history of deteriorating pressure injuries.At time of pick up the system, he had pressure injury category unstagable to sacrum and left buttock and category 2 to right buttock.He required a treatment with a careful hygiene regime, dressings and repositioning.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
NIMBUS 3 / DFS3
Type of Device
MATTRESS, AIR FLOTATION, ALTERNATING PRESSURE
Manufacturer (Section D)
ARJOHUNTLEIGH, A BRANCH OF ARJO LTD MED AB
arjohuntleigh house, houghton hall business park
houghton regis, bedfordshire LU5 5 XF
UK  LU5 5XF
Manufacturer (Section G)
ARJOHUNTLEIGH, A BRANCH OF ARJO LTD MED AB
arjohuntleigh house, houghton hall business park
houghton regis, bedfordshire LU5 5 XF
UK   LU5 5XF
Manufacturer Contact
justyna kielbowska
ks. wawrzyniaka 2
komorniki 62-05-2
PL   62-052
883337089
MDR Report Key14985614
MDR Text Key295687824
Report Number3005619970-2022-00012
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FNM
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUK
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Nurse
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 07/12/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Other
Device Model Number151010
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 06/15/2022
Initial Date FDA Received07/12/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured01/01/2007
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention; Hospitalization;
Patient Age74 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-