• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: W. L. GORE & ASSOCIATES, INC. GORE® VIABAHN® ENDOPROSTHESIS WITH HEPARIN BIOACTIVE SURFACE; STENT, SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

W. L. GORE & ASSOCIATES, INC. GORE® VIABAHN® ENDOPROSTHESIS WITH HEPARIN BIOACTIVE SURFACE; STENT, SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY Back to Search Results
Catalog Number PAHR081002E
Device Problem Complete Blockage (1094)
Patient Problems Obstruction/Occlusion (2422); Thrombosis/Thrombus (4440)
Event Date 06/13/2022
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
On the june 14, 2022, gore received a report about an event that occurred on (b)(6) 2022 at the (b)(6) hospital involving two gore® viabahn® endoprosthesis with propaten bioactive surface (viabahn device) and five gore® viabahn® vbx balloon expandable endoprosthesis (vbx device).The patient presented with blood vessel occlusion starting from the iliac arteries up to the aortic bifurcation.It was reported that the vascular surgeon that achieved the vascular access through the common femoral artery indicated that the arteries were in very poor condition.Patient is wheel chair based and presented with rest pain, very bad blood circulation downstream, arteries presenting calcific occlusions, arterial walls in bad condition with predisposition to rupture.Patient had very bad life style all his life and it was reported that he had series of strokes in the last 10 years.The physician proposed the use of two gore® viabahn® endoprosthesis with propaten bioactive surface in each of the common iliac arteries because the stenosis extended from the common iliac arteries up to the aortic bifrucation and two gore® viabahn® vbx balloon expandable endoprosthesis in a kissing stent formation up to the aortic bifurcation.It was reported that vascular access to the aorta was difficult to achieve due to calcification of the common iliac artery.No complications were reported during while gaining access through the arm.It was reported that the viabahn and the vbx devices were uneventfully deployed.Following the successful deployment of the devices, a pigtail catheter contrast enhanced imaging was performed and it was discovered that an occlusion occurred on the viabahn and vbx devices implanted on the right hand side.A blood clot was believed to be the cause of the occlusion and a balloon embolectomy was conducted.After the embolectomy, another contrast enhanced imagining was performed and it revealed patency on the viabahn and the vbx on the right hand side and simultaneously revealed occlusion on the devices implanted on the left hand side.It was reported that the physician believed the aorta to be damaged above the level of the kissing stents thereby initiating the sequential occlusion of the devices.Therefore, it was decided to further extend the kissing stent formation with one vbx device on each side along the aorta.After the successful implantation of these vbx devices, patency was confirmed in the devices on the left hand side but the devices on right hand side were revealed to be occluded.It was reported that an extra vbx device was implanted to maintain patency along the devices located on the left hand side and was post-dilated to 16 mm.The initial plan was a femoro-femoral bypass to regain patency along the right hand side.However, after performing a pigtail catheter contrast enhanced imaging following this deployment of the final vbx, both sides were revealed to be occluded, therefore an axillo-bifemoral bypass was performed.It was confirmed that a total of 7 devices were implanted and all of them were occluded by the end of the event.Dissection of the aorta was confirmed to be the leading root cause for the reported occlusions.It was reported that during the event the viabahn and vbx devices were deployed as specified through an 8 fr sheath and all endoprostheses were revealed to be patent and functional at some point during the procedure.Its confirmed that the vbx/vsx deployed perfectly and they performed as they were supposed to do.The physicians believed that the occlusions resulted from the damages to the aorta caused by the difficulty encountered while trying to gain vascular access before the endoprostheses were deployed also partially due to the patient's pre-existing frail tissues.It is confirmed that physician stated that the occlusions have nothing to do with devices used as they remained implanted.The root cause is solely based on the patient condition.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Heparin surface incorporates carmeda heparin manufactured from heparin sodium api, which is covalently bound to the device surface and is essentially non-eluting.(b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
GORE® VIABAHN® ENDOPROSTHESIS WITH HEPARIN BIOACTIVE SURFACE
Type of Device
STENT, SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY
Manufacturer (Section D)
W. L. GORE & ASSOCIATES, INC.
1505 n. fourth street
flagstaff AZ 86004
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDICAL ECHO RIDGE B/P
3250 w. kiltie lane
flagstaff AZ 86005
Manufacturer Contact
wilson okeke
1505 n. fourth street
flagstaff, AZ 86004
9285263030
MDR Report Key14998006
MDR Text Key295769918
Report Number2017233-2022-03111
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIP
Combination Product (y/n)Y
Reporter Country CodeUK
PMA/PMN Number
P040037
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 11/03/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received07/13/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberPAHR081002E
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received11/02/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured01/30/2022
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age50 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-