• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION POLARIS ULTRA; STENT, URETERAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION POLARIS ULTRA; STENT, URETERAL Back to Search Results
Model Number M0061921230
Device Problem Migration (4003)
Patient Problem Pain (1994)
Event Date 06/19/2022
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that a polaris ultra ureteral stent was used during a ureteroscopy procedure in the kidney, performed on (b)(6) 2022.Post procedure, on (b)(6) 2022, the patient went to the hospital with a complaint of pain.An x-ray was taken and it was noticed that the stent had migrated from the kidney down to the urinary bladder.On (b)(6) 2022, a follow up procedure was performed to remove the stent.The migrated stent was retrieved with the use of a pair of biopsy forceps.Another polaris ultra ureteral stent was opened and successfully completed the procedure.There was no information of medication or treatment given for pain.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The complainant was unable to provide the suspect device lot number; therefore, the lot expiration and device manufacture dates are unknown.(b)(4).The device has not been received for analysis.Upon receipt and completion of the failure analysis of the complaint device, if there is any further relevant information from that review, a supplemental medwatch will be filed.
 
Event Description
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that a polaris ultra ureteral stent was used during a ureteroscopy procedure in the kidney, performed on (b)(6) 2022.Post procedure, on (b)(6) 2022, the patient went to the hospital with a complaint of pain.An x-ray was taken and it was noticed that the stent had migrated from the kidney down to the urinary bladder.On (b)(6) 2022, a follow up procedure was performed to remove the stent.The migrated stent was retrieved with the use of a pair of biopsy forceps.Another polaris ultra ureteral stent was opened and successfully completed the procedure.There was no information of medication or treatment given for pain.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Block d4, h4: the complainant was unable to provide the suspect device lot number; therefore, the lot expiration and device manufacture dates are unknown.Block h6: medical device problem code a010402 captures the reportable event of stent migration.Impact code f22 captures the reportable event of unexpected diagnostic intervention.Patient code c2330 captures the reportable event of pain.Block h10: the returned device was analyzed, and a visual evaluation noted that the device received was not a bsc ureteral stent.It is not a polaris ultra stent 5f, there is no white pigtail and it is a 4.8f.There is no legend along the stent.It has an additional mark after what we consider the bladder band mark.It is quite similar to the marflow ag stent of the competence.No other issues with the device were noted.The reported event was not confirmed.According to the product analysis, the returned device it is not considered a device manufactured by boston scientific, during the analysis was concluded that the device is not a polaris ultra stent 5f, there is no white pigtail and it is a 4.8f, there is no legend along the stent, it has an additional mark after what we consider the bladder band mark and it is quite similar to the marflow ag stent of the competence.Therefore, no problem detected is selected as the most probable root cause for the complaint.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Block d4, h4: the complainant was unable to provide the suspect device lot number; therefore, the lot expiration and device manufacture dates are unknown.Block h6: medical device problem code a010402 captures the reportable event of stent migration.Impact code f22 captures the reportable event of unexpected diagnostic intervention.Patient code c2330 captures the reportable event of pain.Block h10: the device has not been received for analysis.Upon receipt and completion of the failure analysis of the complaint device, if there is any further relevant information from that review, a supplemental medwatch will be filed.
 
Event Description
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that a polaris ultra ureteral stent was used during a ureteroscopy procedure in the kidney, performed on (b)(6) 2022.Post procedure, on (b)(6) 2022, the patient went to the hospital with a complaint of pain.An x-ray was taken and it was noticed that the stent had migrated from the kidney down to the urinary bladder.On (b)(6) 2022, a follow up procedure was performed to remove the stent.The migrated stent was retrieved with the use of a pair of biopsy forceps.Another polaris ultra ureteral stent was opened and successfully completed the procedure.There was no information of medication or treatment given for pain.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
POLARIS ULTRA
Type of Device
STENT, URETERAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
300 boston scientific way
marlborough MA 01752
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
2546 calle primera
alajuela
CS  
Manufacturer Contact
carole morley
300 boston scientific way
marlborough, MA 01752
5086834015
MDR Report Key15017363
MDR Text Key295913524
Report Number3005099803-2022-03679
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FAD
UDI-Device Identifier08714729124320
UDI-Public08714729124320
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeSA
PMA/PMN Number
K010002
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative,Distributor
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 09/12/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberM0061921230
Device Catalogue Number192-123
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 06/19/2022
Initial Date FDA Received07/14/2022
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received07/27/2022
08/17/2022
Supplement Dates FDA Received08/19/2022
09/12/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age60 YR
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight83 KG
-
-