|
Model Number M0061921230 |
Device Problem
Migration (4003)
|
Patient Problem
Pain (1994)
|
Event Date 06/19/2022 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that a polaris ultra ureteral stent was used during a ureteroscopy procedure in the kidney, performed on (b)(6) 2022.Post procedure, on (b)(6) 2022, the patient went to the hospital with a complaint of pain.An x-ray was taken and it was noticed that the stent had migrated from the kidney down to the urinary bladder.On (b)(6) 2022, a follow up procedure was performed to remove the stent.The migrated stent was retrieved with the use of a pair of biopsy forceps.Another polaris ultra ureteral stent was opened and successfully completed the procedure.There was no information of medication or treatment given for pain.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The complainant was unable to provide the suspect device lot number; therefore, the lot expiration and device manufacture dates are unknown.(b)(4).The device has not been received for analysis.Upon receipt and completion of the failure analysis of the complaint device, if there is any further relevant information from that review, a supplemental medwatch will be filed.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that a polaris ultra ureteral stent was used during a ureteroscopy procedure in the kidney, performed on (b)(6) 2022.Post procedure, on (b)(6) 2022, the patient went to the hospital with a complaint of pain.An x-ray was taken and it was noticed that the stent had migrated from the kidney down to the urinary bladder.On (b)(6) 2022, a follow up procedure was performed to remove the stent.The migrated stent was retrieved with the use of a pair of biopsy forceps.Another polaris ultra ureteral stent was opened and successfully completed the procedure.There was no information of medication or treatment given for pain.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Block d4, h4: the complainant was unable to provide the suspect device lot number; therefore, the lot expiration and device manufacture dates are unknown.Block h6: medical device problem code a010402 captures the reportable event of stent migration.Impact code f22 captures the reportable event of unexpected diagnostic intervention.Patient code c2330 captures the reportable event of pain.Block h10: the returned device was analyzed, and a visual evaluation noted that the device received was not a bsc ureteral stent.It is not a polaris ultra stent 5f, there is no white pigtail and it is a 4.8f.There is no legend along the stent.It has an additional mark after what we consider the bladder band mark.It is quite similar to the marflow ag stent of the competence.No other issues with the device were noted.The reported event was not confirmed.According to the product analysis, the returned device it is not considered a device manufactured by boston scientific, during the analysis was concluded that the device is not a polaris ultra stent 5f, there is no white pigtail and it is a 4.8f, there is no legend along the stent, it has an additional mark after what we consider the bladder band mark and it is quite similar to the marflow ag stent of the competence.Therefore, no problem detected is selected as the most probable root cause for the complaint.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Block d4, h4: the complainant was unable to provide the suspect device lot number; therefore, the lot expiration and device manufacture dates are unknown.Block h6: medical device problem code a010402 captures the reportable event of stent migration.Impact code f22 captures the reportable event of unexpected diagnostic intervention.Patient code c2330 captures the reportable event of pain.Block h10: the device has not been received for analysis.Upon receipt and completion of the failure analysis of the complaint device, if there is any further relevant information from that review, a supplemental medwatch will be filed.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that a polaris ultra ureteral stent was used during a ureteroscopy procedure in the kidney, performed on (b)(6) 2022.Post procedure, on (b)(6) 2022, the patient went to the hospital with a complaint of pain.An x-ray was taken and it was noticed that the stent had migrated from the kidney down to the urinary bladder.On (b)(6) 2022, a follow up procedure was performed to remove the stent.The migrated stent was retrieved with the use of a pair of biopsy forceps.Another polaris ultra ureteral stent was opened and successfully completed the procedure.There was no information of medication or treatment given for pain.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|