• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: TERUMO CORPORATION, ASHITAKA TERUMO PROGREAT CATHETER; CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

TERUMO CORPORATION, ASHITAKA TERUMO PROGREAT CATHETER; CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC Back to Search Results
Model Number N/A
Device Problem Fracture (1260)
Patient Problem Vascular Dissection (3160)
Event Date 05/09/2022
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
A review of the manufacturing record and the shipping inspection record of the involved product code/lot number combination confirmed that there were not any indications of anomaly in them.A search of the complaint file found no other similar report for the involved product code/lot number combination from other facilities.Terumo medical products (tmp) (importer) registration no.(b)(4) is submitting this report on behalf of ashitaka factory of terumo corporation (manufacturer) registration no.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
The user facility reported a middle third rupture in the microcatheter after attempted microcatheterization of a bronchial artery.The final patient impact was not harmed.Additional information was received on 07 jul 2022: there was no passage of hemostasis material such as coils or particles, only injections of contrast product were performed before it ruptured.The progreat 2.4 fr catheter was in a 5fr rdc catheter with a single-way stopcock at its end.The tip of the catheter broke off partially in the patient, a portion was still in the catheter.The microcatheter was removed by suctioning with a syringe.There were no difficulties/resistance felt before the rupture.Since the event occurred at the end of the procedure, no replacement catheter was needed.There was no real impact on the therapeutic management, however it precipitated the end of the procedure.Ending the procedure was due to the bronchial artery being dissected after several attempts at catheterization and therefore was more accessible for injecting an embolizing agent.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The actual sample was returned for investigation.Visual inspection of the actual sample found that the catheter had been cut off in two places; therefore, it was inferred that the "rupture" described in the reported issue was this cutting section.The length of the cut piece was approximately 6mm.The length of each section of the actual sample was measured.The length of the distal side was approximately 744mm.The length of the cut piece was approximately 6mm.The length of the hand side was approximately 750mm.The total length was approximately 1500mm.Since the involved product was a 1500mm type, it was inferred that there was none missing.Magnifying inspection of the cutting section found that the stainless-steel reinforcement had been exposed and the cutting section had been crushed in an oval shape.The outer and inner diameters of the actual sample (normal section) were measured and confirmed to meet the specifications.During a simulation test a factory-retained progreat was inserted into a factory-retained angiographic catheter (glidecath, with a stopcock).In the state of "1", the operation of closing the stopcock by approximately 90 ° was performed.After operating the stopcock, progreat was removed from the angiographic catheter and visual inspection of it was performed.It was found that the stopcock operating section was cut off in two places.The length of the cut piece was approximately 6mm.Magnifying inspection of the cutting section found in "3" found that the stainless-steel reinforcement was exposed and the cutting section was crushed in an oval shape.It was very similar to the actual sample.Based on the investigation result, it was likely that since the stopcock was operated with the actual sample inserted in the device and used in combination, the actual sample was caught in the stopcock and cut off.Relevant ifu reference: "if the guiding catheter is fitted with a stopcock, do not close the stopcock with the catheter inside the guiding catheter.The catheter may be broken.".
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TERUMO PROGREAT CATHETER
Type of Device
CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC
Manufacturer (Section D)
TERUMO CORPORATION, ASHITAKA
150 maimaigi-cho
fujinomiya city, 418
JA  418
Manufacturer (Section G)
TERUMO CORPORATION, ASHITAKA
reg. no. 9681834
150 maimaigi-cho
fujinomiya city, 418
JA   418
Manufacturer Contact
stephanie handy
reg. no. 2243441
950 elkton blvd
elkton, MD 21921
9499890491
MDR Report Key15025970
MDR Text Key295955160
Report Number9681834-2022-00134
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DQO
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeFR
PMA/PMN Number
K033583
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 07/15/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date08/31/2023
Device Model NumberN/A
Device Catalogue NumberMC-PP24151ZV
Device Lot Number210914
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 06/23/2022
Initial Date FDA Received07/15/2022
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received07/15/2022
Supplement Dates FDA Received08/08/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured09/14/2021
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
5FR RDC CATHETER
Patient Outcome(s) Other; Required Intervention;
Patient Age42 YR
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight88 KG
-
-