Product complaint # (b)(4).(b)(4).Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
This complaint is from a literature source.The following literature cite has been reviewed: kaszuba sv, behrens km, anderson cb, gordon ac.A workflow change in anterior approach total hip arthroplasty leads to improved accuracy of biomechanical reconstruction without increased risk of complications.Arthroplasty today.2021 jul 15;10:99-104.Doi: 10.1016/j.Artd.2021.06.007.Pmid: 34337115; pmcid: pmc8318915.Objective and methods: authors performed a retrospective review of 267 direct anterior approach (daa) total hip arthroplasty (tha) with comparison of workflow modifications, addressing the standard acetabulum first (af) technique (132 hips) versus femur first (ff) technique (135 hips), assessing the precision of biomechanical hip reconstruction and clinical outcomes between the af and ff techniques for a minimum 1-year follow-up.Five different femoral stems were used in the study participants: four from depuy (actis (126 hips), corail (101 hips), c-stem (29 hips), and summit (6 hips)) and one competitor stem (5 hips).No information was provided with respect to femoral head details, nor was any information given with regard to acetabular cup and liner configurations or manufacturer(s).Individual patient information was not broken out into specific case number or age/gender demographics.Results: the ff group demonstrated significantly more accurate and more precise reconstruction of horizontal and vertical hip centers, femoral offset, and leg length.There was no significant difference in operative time, hemoglobin change, complication rate, or survey scores between the two groups.Complications (af group): 1: intraoperative calcar femur fracture, treated with 2 cable cerclage orif.1: intraoperative fracture, stem perforation of femur, treated with trochanteric resection and use of longer stem.1: infection, treated with i&d and head/liner exchange.2: infection, treated with simple i&d (no implant exchange reported).1: deep vein thrombosis, treated medically with rivaroxaban.1: myocardial infarction treated with percutaneous coronary intervention complications (ff group): 1: infection resulting in septic acetabular component loosening, requiring a revision (no details provided).1: acute kidney injury and symptomatic hyponatremia during the postoperative recovery course (no treatment or recovery details were provided).
|