DEPUY MITEK LLC US VAPR TRIPOLAR90 SUCTION ELECTRODE; ENDOSCOPIC ELECTROSURGICAL ELECTRODE, BIPOLAR, SINGLE USE
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number 225028 |
Device Problems
Display or Visual Feedback Problem (1184); Infusion or Flow Problem (2964)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 06/24/2022 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Additional narrative: udi: (b)(4).To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported by the customer in france that during an arthroscopic rotator cuff repair procedure on (b)(6) 2022, it was observed that the vapr tripolar90 suction electrode device had bubbles and was clogged.Another like device was used to complete the procedure.There were no adverse patient consequences nor surgical delay reported.No additional information was provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H10 additional narrative: d9, h3, h6: the actual device has been returned and is currently pending evaluation.Once reliability engineering evaluates the device, a supplemental medwatch report will be sent accordingly.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H10 additional narrative: investigation summary: the complaint device was received and evaluated.Visual inspection revealed signs of activation in the tip; also, the suction tube shows saline and biological residues.The cable is in good condition as well as the connector and pins.For the suction testing, the electrode was sent to the manufacturer for further evaluation.The vapr tripolar 90 suction elect was returned to manufacturer for evaluation.The manufacturer conducted visual inspection and functional test of device received by customer.A visual inspection of the device was performed; as a result, the device not returned in the original packaging.The active tip is in a used condition with visible tissue debris in suction port and no visible damage to the device.No failure found during the electrical test.The claim of the suction being clogged was substantiated with the device found not to achieve the minimum flow specification.During the testing it was observed that tissue debris was freed from the suction path but not to a sufficient degree to achieve the flow specification.A dhr review has been performed for the complaint device lot number u2202046; no issues (ncrs or deviations) with the manufacturing process have been indicated which might explain the failures observed.Based on a review of the investigation findings and the product risk analysis document no correction action has been implemented.From our investigation we were able to confirm the customer report that the electrode suction was clogged with the returned device.The device was found to fail flow specifications due to a build-up of tissue debris within the suction path at the distal end of the device, some of which the product ifu cautions not to allow the electrode to become covered in tissue debris.If this occurs, use a new electrode.The suction failure mode has been freed during testing but not enough for the device to achieve the flow test specifications.At this point in time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted.However, depuy synthes mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|