It was reported that, 4-5 years after a thr, the patient had a bad fall from her bed resulting in a periprosthetic fracture.On (b)(6) 2022 patient underwent a revision surgery to address the fracture by revising an uncemented polarstem and a 32mm oxinium femoral head.The procedure went without incident.Current health status of the patient is unknown.
|
H3, h6: it was reported that, 4-5 years after a thr, the patient had a bad fall from her bed resulting in a periprosthetic fracture.On (b)(6)2022 patient underwent a revision surgery to address the fracture by revising an uncemented polarstem and a 32mm oxinium femoral head.The procedure went without incident.Current health status of the patient is unknown.The device in scope of this complaint, was not returned for investigation.A review of the complaint history was performed.The occurrence of the reported failure mode is within its expected risk level as per risk management.A review of the risk management documentation verified the failure mode and severity of the reported issue.The device labeling was reviewed, the ifu for the complaint device (lit.No.12.23, ed.03/21) stated possible side effect such as hip fracture resulting from hip arthroplasty.Due to insufficient information, it is not possible to perform a review of past corrective actions.For the medical investigation, the periprosthetic fracture and subsequent revision were reported as a result of the patients¿ ¿bad fall from bed¿ and is not associated with a mal performance of the implant.It should be noted the patients¿ osteoporosis cannot be ruled out as a contributing factor to the reported periprosthetic fracture.The patient impact beyond the revision and expected transient post-op convalescence period cannot be determined.No further clinical assessment is warranted at this time based on available information, the reported failure mode could not be confirmed.A relationship between the reported event and the device cannot be confirmed.Due to insufficient information, it is not possible to speculate about factors which could have contributed to the reported event.No probable cause can be determined.The need for corrective action is not indicated.Nevertheless, smith + nephew will continue to monitor this device for similar issues.Should additional information become available, this complaint will be reopened.
|