• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PRISMATIK DENTALCRAFT, INC. COMFORT HARD SOFT SPLINT; THERMOFORM MOUTHGUARD

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PRISMATIK DENTALCRAFT, INC. COMFORT HARD SOFT SPLINT; THERMOFORM MOUTHGUARD Back to Search Results
Device Problem Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problem Hypersensitivity/Allergic reaction (1907)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The device has not been returned.If/when there is more information provided, a supplemental report will be submitted.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the patient had a reaction to the comfort hard soft splint.It is unclear when the patient received the device, when the patient first used the device, or when the reaction occurred.However, it is noted that the patient experienced "swelling of the lips.".
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The device was returned, the investigation has been completed and the results are as follows: dhr results: the dhr was reviewed and there was no evidence discovered to indicate that a product defect or non-conformity contributed to the issue.Supplier (erkodent) reviewed the associated material lot and confirmed no manufacturing deviation or abnormality.Lot# e-pro 4.0-11771202 (erkoloc-pro) was manufactured from november 17, 2021 and was assigned an expiration of november 2024.Stock product reviewed results: no stock product was available for review since the device was fabricated per physician's prescription only.Investigation methods/results: complaint investigator reviewed the returned device.An upper splint was returned in the original case.The results were summarized: roughness - the flange was not smooth and had visible roughness at teeth location #10, #11, #13, & #15; internal/external surfaces appeared not smooth.Crack - no major crack was found.Delamination - layers were intact and did not separate.Discoloration - the device was not clear or transparent.General cleanliness - the returned device was not clean and debris can be observed.Case was returned in a good condition with label.The returned device was visually inspected and no defect or abnormality was observed.There was no evidence found to indicate that the reported issue was caused by the device itself.Root cause: a root cause for this complaint cannot be explicitly determined.Ifu 9091 rev 4.0 (comfort h/s bite splint instruction for use) states "brush and floss your teeth before use.Rinse mouth well with clean water before inserting the device.If patient uses mouthwash, all traces of mouthwash should be removed by thoroughly rinsing out mouth with water.Rinse bite splint well with clean, cool water before and after use.Clean bite splint with clean, cool water only and let air dry.Ifu provides warning: ·use only clear, cool water to wash the device.·do not clean or soak in mouthwash.·do not use denture cleanser.·do not use hot water.·do not use alcohol or hydrogen peroxide.·do not place in direct sunlight.Keep away from heat sources." it is possible that reactions could be caused by mouthwash, toothpaste, or soaking material.However, the customer did not provide the information regarding how the patient handled and maintained the device.Supplier erkodent reviewed the incident details and determined an allergic reaction could not be excluded.Glidewell research team and namsa conducted a series of testing on a similar thermoformed sleep device (haley) following iso 10993 (biological evaluation of medical devices) and the device was evaluated for potential cytotoxicity, skin irritation, delayed dermal contact sensitization and oral mucosal irritation.The haley test article was thermoformed with layers of erkodent material (erkoloc-pro and erkodur).The test results were listed below and summarized in biocompatibility report for haley sleep device (rpt 9733 rev 1.0) for cytotoxicity testing, the test article extract showed no evidence of causing cell lysis or toxicity.For skin irritation, there was no erythema and no edema observed on the skin of the animals treated with the test article.For sensitization testing, the test article extracts showed no evidence of causing delayed dermal contact sensitization.The test article showed nonirritant to the oral mucosa as compared to the control article.The device materials have been found to be biocompatible through the testing.There was no cytotoxic, sensitization, skin irritation, or oral mucosal irritation found in any of the test articles.This complaint will be kept on record for track and trending purposes.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
COMFORT HARD SOFT SPLINT
Type of Device
THERMOFORM MOUTHGUARD
Manufacturer (Section D)
PRISMATIK DENTALCRAFT, INC.
2144 michelson drive
irvine CA 92612
Manufacturer (Section G)
PRISMATIK DENTALCRAFT, INC.
2144 michelson drive
irvine CA 92612
Manufacturer Contact
herbert crane
2144 michelson drive
irvine, CA 92612
9495021907
MDR Report Key15094886
MDR Text Key296510811
Report Number3011649314-2022-00452
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MQC
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K121365
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Dentist
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 04/09/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received07/25/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received10/05/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured04/29/2022
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age53 YR
Patient RaceWhite
-
-