It was reported that, during left hip bhr resurfacing surgery, after placing a 48mm bhr acetabular cup, when pulling out the cable with the polyethylene impactor, it got caught and dislodged the cup after the cable had already been cut.The surgeon tried to re-impact the cup, however, it failed to be repositioned.The 48mm bhr acetabular cup was removed and the procedure was finished using a 50mm bhr acetabular cup after reaming was performed up to size 49.No further complications were reported.
|
Additional information: h6 (component code, type of investigation, investigation findings, investigation conclusions).Results of investigation: it was reported that during a left hip bhr resurfacing surgery the cup got dislodged and it failed to be repositioned.As of today, the implanted device used in treatment is not accessible for testing.Without a definitive batch number, a complete review of the historical complaints data cannot be performed for the acetabular cup.A review of historical complaints data was performed using the part numbers and the reported failure modes to evaluate patterns of repeated failures or defects.Similar complaints were identified for the acetabular cup.However, as the device is no longer sold, no action is to be taken.As no device batch number was provided for investigation, manufacturing record review, device labelling / ifu review could not be performed.If more information is received, this investigation will be reopened.A risk management review was performed.The alleged failure modes and associated risks have been anticipated within the risk file and the anticipated risk level is still adequate.No further actions are required at this time.A review of historic escalation actions related to the products and similar complaint events was performed.Following the review, no prior applicable escalation actions were identified.The available medical documents were reviewed.With the information provided, we cannot rule out a procedural/user error as a contributory factor to the reported dislodging of the acetabular cup.It cannot be concluded the reported events were associated with a mal performance or failure of the implant.It is noted she tolerated the procedure well and the implants remained in situ for 12 years post implantation.Based on the available information we can confirm the reported complaint, however without further information our investigation remains inconclusive, and a definitive root cause cannot be determined.Based on the limited information provided we are unable to speculate on specific factors known to contribute to the alleged fault.Should the device or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective and preventative actions is not indicated.
|