• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DAVIS & GECK CARIBE LTD ENDO CLIP II; CLIP, IMPLANTABLE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DAVIS & GECK CARIBE LTD ENDO CLIP II; CLIP, IMPLANTABLE Back to Search Results
Model Number 176657
Device Problems Fail-Safe Problem (2936); Mechanics Altered (2984)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 07/21/2022
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
According to the reporter, during a laparoscopic gallbladder surgery, before clipping the blood vessel, the clip did not clip properly even when the it was squeezed as usual. a new clip was used to resolve the issue.There was no patient injury.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
According to the reporter, during a laparoscopic gallbladder (cholecystectomy) surgery, while clipping the blood vessel, the device was unable to be squeezed when the surgeon tried firing the device.It was also noted that the clip did not come out properly even when the device was squeezed.A new clip was used to resolve the issue.There was no patient injury.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Corrected information: b5, g3, h6 medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H3: evaluation summary: medtronic conducted an investigation based upon all information received.The device was available for evaluation.Visual inspection noted the handle was broken and out position, in a manner consistent of cycling through the safety interlock.It was reported that the clips did not load properly into the jaws as expected and the safety interlock deployed prior to all staples or clips firing.The reported issues were confirmed.The product analysis noted evidence that the device was not used as intended.This issue can occur under the following conditions, when the firing handle has not been allowed to fully return to the home position after forming a previous clip.A single continuous handle compression is one of two firing methods described in the information booklet which accompanies each product shipment, if the handle is compressed at an accelerated rate, clips do not have enough time to enter the jaws and the instrument will lock preventing the jaws from closing without a clip.The manufacturing records for each device are thoroughly reviewed prior to release to ensure that it meets all medtronic quality specifications.The instructions included with this device provide the following guidance: confirm that the clip is positioned within the jaws and is free of other clips or obstructions before squeezing the handle to close the clip.However, rather than forceful compression of the firing handle under these circumstances, if the firing handle is fully released by relieving hand pressure, the interlock feature will disengage, the next clip will load, and the clip can be applied.Furthermore; if an attempt is made to forcibly fire the instrument while engaged in interlock after all the clips has been fired, the lugs are designed to break as noted.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ENDO CLIP II
Type of Device
CLIP, IMPLANTABLE
Manufacturer (Section D)
DAVIS & GECK CARIBE LTD
zona franca de san isidro
santo domingo 0101
DR  0101
Manufacturer (Section G)
DAVIS & GECK CARIBE LTD
zona franca de san isidro
santo domingo 0101
DR   0101
Manufacturer Contact
justin ellis
8200 coral sea st ne
mounds view, MN 55112
7635265677
MDR Report Key15170060
MDR Text Key302784162
Report Number9612501-2022-01322
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FZP
UDI-Device Identifier10884521057869
UDI-Public10884521057869
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
K143644
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 10/21/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number176657
Device Catalogue Number176657
Device Lot NumberJ2C2367NY
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer07/22/2022
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 07/21/2022
Initial Date FDA Received08/04/2022
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received08/10/2022
10/11/2022
Supplement Dates FDA Received08/25/2022
10/21/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured03/22/2022
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-