BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION MOMENTUM X4 CRT-D; DEFIBRILLATOR, AUTOMATIC IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER, WITH CRT-D
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number G138 |
Device Problems
Pacing Problem (1439); Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings (1535); Inappropriate/Inadequate Shock/Stimulation (1574)
|
Patient Problems
Arrhythmia (1721); Anxiety (2328); Electric Shock (2554)
|
Event Date 06/10/2022 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that this cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (crt-d) was found to be in safety mode.The patient reported that due to a complicated heart rate management for recurrent non sustained ventricular tachycardia (vt) and a replacement of a mitral valve, the situation rapidly worsened and had to be rushed to hospital where it could not be diagnose due to lack of electro physiologists over weekend.The patient had to be drugged for four days to stabilize the heart arrhythmia which was worsened by constant pacing.The patient had to lay in the same position, as sitting up stopped the device from pacing.The patient got inappropriately shocked six times over that period.The device was subsequently explanted and replaced.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Correction: codes e020201 and e0601 added.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that this cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (crt-d) was found to be in safety mode.The patient reported that due to a complicated heart rate management for recurrent non sustained ventricular tachycardia (vt) and a replacement of a mitral valve, the situation rapidly worsened and had to be rushed to hospital where it could not be diagnose due to lack of electro physiologists over weekend.The patient had to be drugged for four days to stabilize the heart arrhythmia which was worsened by constant pacing.The patient had to lay in the same position, as sitting up stopped the device from pacing and was reported very distressful.The patient got inappropriately shocked six times over that period.The device was subsequently explanted and replaced.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|