• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ARJOHUNTLEIGH POLSKA SP. Z O.O. CITADEL PATIENT CARE SYSTEM; BED, AC-POWERED ADJUSTABLE HOSPITAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ARJOHUNTLEIGH POLSKA SP. Z O.O. CITADEL PATIENT CARE SYSTEM; BED, AC-POWERED ADJUSTABLE HOSPITAL Back to Search Results
Model Number CX811A3F3AMAB0
Device Problems Use of Device Problem (1670); Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problem Fall (1848)
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
Arjo was informed about the incident with the citadel bed frame involvement.It was reported that the patient fell out from bed and the exit detection alarm did not trigger.No injury was sustained.After the event, an arjo representative visited the customer to perform the device inspection.The service technician could not replicate the reported problem and did not find any bed malfunction.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation is ongoing.The follow-up will be provided within next report.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Arjo was informed about the incident with the citadel bed frame involvement.It was reported that the patient fell out from the bed and the exit detection alarm did not trigger.After the event, an arjo representative visited the customer to perform the device inspection.According to the information provided, the technician tested the bed several times (with the side rails lowered and raised, the bed raised to its highest position and lowered to its lowest position) and found no damage or malfunctions.All the bed cables were also not damaged and did not have any open connections, the scale read the weight correctly and the exit detection alarm worked properly.The technician suspected that the exit detection alarm may not have been turned on.For better understanding of the circumstances of the incident, we have contacted the initial reporter who stated that at a time of the fall, the bed side rails were raised.The patient was lying on bed and decided to try to get out of bed for a walk.The patient had bilateral leg weakness and after leaving the bed, he immediately fell to the ground.The nurses heard that the patient hit the floor but did not hear the alarm.Another nurse picked up the pillow from the floor and threw it on the bed and then the bed alarm triggered and started to sound.Based on the information gathered, it is unknown which alarm had triggered since the device evaluation showed that the exit detection alarm was working properly.Based on the information gathered, we concluded that the cause of the patient fall was related to his medical condition and attend to leave the bed despite the side rails being raised.To sum up, the citadel bed frame was used for a patient treatment when the patient fell out of the device and from that perspective the equipment did not meet its performance specifications.This complaint was deemed reportable due to allegation of patient fall from the bed.No injury was sustained.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CITADEL PATIENT CARE SYSTEM
Type of Device
BED, AC-POWERED ADJUSTABLE HOSPITAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
ARJOHUNTLEIGH POLSKA SP. Z O.O.
ul. ks. piotra wawrzyniaka 2
komorniki PL-62 052
PL  PL-62052
Manufacturer (Section G)
ARJOHUNTLEIGH POLSKA SP. Z O.O.
ul. ks. piotra wawrzyniaka 2
komorniki PL-62 052
PL   PL-62052
Manufacturer Contact
justyna kielbowska
ks. wawrzyniaka 2
komorniki 62-05-2
PL   62-052
883337089
MDR Report Key15173542
MDR Text Key304308523
Report Number3007420694-2022-00129
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FNL
UDI-Device Identifier05055982755764
UDI-Public(01)05055982755764(11)201109
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 08/19/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Other
Device Model NumberCX811A3F3AMAB0
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 07/10/2022
Initial Date FDA Received08/05/2022
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received07/10/2022
Supplement Dates FDA Received08/19/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured11/09/2020
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-