• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION ENVEO PRO DELIVERY SYSTEM; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIV

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION ENVEO PRO DELIVERY SYSTEM; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIV Back to Search Results
Model Number ENVPRO-16-US
Device Problems Material Separation (1562); Failure to Advance (2524)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 07/20/2022
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Product analysis: the device was discarded, therefore no product analysis can be performed.Conclusion: without return of the product, no definitive conclusions could be drawn regarding the clinical observation.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Medtronic received information that during the implant of a transcatheter bioprosthetic valve, access was performed within an anatomy of previously reconstructed bilateral iliacs with stents.As a 16f dilator tracked up the left side for main access and was able to get through the stents, the physician determined an 18f would be appropriate for the 34 millimeter (mm) evolut proplus transcatheter valve.However, when inserting the delivery catheter system (dcs), the dcs could not advance past the proximal portion of the existing stent.As result, this system was removed and the system for a 34mm evolut r was prepped.There was no resistance felt or loading issues with the evolut r system.The 34mm evolut r system was attempted but access could not be obtained.The iliac contained an existing stent, diameter of 7.0 mm.The physician then elected to dilate the iliac with a 9mm balloon.The iliac ballooning did work, but it only allowed the 34r dcs to reach the common iliac.This dcs was buckled on itself and was not able to cross the specific area of calcium and track along the vessel.This system was removed.A non-medtronic sheath placed and a non-medtronic valve was successfully implanted.No adverse patient effects were reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Conclusion: a device history record (dhr) review was performed on the delivery catheter system (dcs) and there were no correlations/ issues identified regarding manufacturing.The device was manufactured per approved and released manufacturing processes and the device met all applicable manufacturing specifications prior to release for distribution.The dhr review did not show any findings related to this event.The subject dcs was discarded by the customer and therefore was unable to be returned to medtronic for analysis.No procedural images were provided for review.Difficulties advancing the dcs through the access vessel is known to be related to factors such as patient anatomy and physician technique, including guidewire and introducer sheath selection.In this case, it was reported that the dcs was not able to cross the specific area of calcium and track along the vessel.This indicates that the probable cause of the advancement difficulties was patient anatomy, but this cannot be confirmed with the limited information available.Advancement difficulties do not typically indicate a device malfunction or a failure to meet manufacturing specifications.It was reported that the dcs buckled on itself when tracking through the anatomy.With the limited information available and without the dcs for analysis or images to review, an exact root cause of the reported buckle cannot be confirmed; however, patient anatomy (vessel tortuosity calcification) and use conditions due to challenging anatomy (insertion angle, force required to advance, torqueing of the catheter) are known potential contributing factors to capsule damage.In this case, the challenging anatomy present may have caused or contributed to the capsule damage, but this cannot be conclusively confirmed with the evidence available.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ENVEO PRO DELIVERY SYSTEM
Type of Device
AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIV
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION
1851 e deere ave
santa ana CA 92705
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION
1851 e deere ave
santa ana CA 92705
Manufacturer Contact
alison sweeney
parkmore business park west
galway 
EI  
091708096
MDR Report Key15200792
MDR Text Key302582016
Report Number2025587-2022-02221
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NPT
UDI-Device Identifier00643169987210
UDI-Public00643169987210
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P130021
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 08/30/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date09/24/2023
Device Model NumberENVPRO-16-US
Device Catalogue NumberENVPRO-16-US
Device Lot Number0010866033
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 07/20/2022
Initial Date FDA Received08/10/2022
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received08/11/2022
Supplement Dates FDA Received08/30/2022
Date Device Manufactured09/24/2021
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age81 YR
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight76 KG
-
-