• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: W. L. GORE & ASSOCIATES, INC. GORE® VIABAHN® ENDOPROSTHESIS; STENT, SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

W. L. GORE & ASSOCIATES, INC. GORE® VIABAHN® ENDOPROSTHESIS; STENT, SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY Back to Search Results
Device Problems Material Invagination (1336); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Stenosis (2263)
Event Date 03/01/2021
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Article citation: title: four-year outcomes following endovascular repair in patients with traumatic isolated popliteal artery injuries.Chuli jiang, et al.Https://doi.Org/10.1016/j.Jvs.2020.12.050.Journal of vascular surgery.Volume 73, issue 6, june 2021, pages 2064-2070.Patient weight was unavailable.Implant date was unavailable.Patient demographics: provided mean age was 51 years old and gender of article is 70% male, 30% female.Patient information will reflect 51-year-old male.A review of the manufacturing records for the device was unable to be conducted as no lot number was available.The device was not accessible for testing, therefore, the device was not able to be evaluated.It is unknown if these adverse events were related to the viabahn devices.Information was not made available.Cause of the event cannot be established based on the available information.Further information regarding this event was requested by gore, but no further information has been reported, therefore this investigation is considered complete.W.L.Gore & associates, inc.(gore) is submitting this report to comply with 21 c.F.R.Part 803, the medical device reporting regulation.This report is based upon information obtained by gore, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Blank fields present on this report include required fields and fields determined to be not applicable.Blank required fields indicate that the information was not provided, was deemed unavailable or was not applicable.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, gore, or its associates that the device, gore or its associates caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute a legal admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any defects or has malfunctioned, as defined from a legal standpoint.These words are included in the report and are fixed items for selection created by the fda, to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of reporting pursuant to part 803.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.
 
Event Description
The following information was received through literature ¿four-year outcomes following endovascular repair in patients with traumatic isolated popliteal artery injuries¿ published in journal of vascular surgery in 2021.This study was aimed to investigate the midterm outcomes of endovascular repair of traumatic isolated popliteal arterial injury.From (b)(6) 2012 to (b)(6) 2020, 46 patients who underwent endovascular repair using viabahn devices for traumatic popliteal arterial injuries were reviewed.The patients were mainly in traffic accidents and had traumatic injuries.Conclusion: endovascular repair of an isolated popliteal artery injury may be a safe and effective alternative treatment in select patients, with acceptable midterm outcomes.5 patients required below-knee amputation owing to irreversible ischemia within 48 hours after endovascular treatment.All of them had class iii acute limb ischemia and a long time interval from trauma to blood flow restoration (>20 hours).6 patients had graft occlusion and underwent reintervention within 30 days.All of them had combined tibial plateau or distal femoral fracture.After endovascular repair, open reduction and internal fixation was performed, and ischemic symptoms developed within 14 days after the orthopedic surgery.The patients were treated with catheter-directed thrombolysis because of intrastent thromboses.One received balloon angioplasty and inline stenting owing to an in-folding stent graft.The symptoms resolved successfully after reintervention in all patients.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
B1: add product problem.
 
Event Description
The following information was received through literature ¿four-year outcomes following endovascular repair in patients with traumatic isolated popliteal artery injuries¿ published in journal of vascular surgery in 2021.This study was aimed to investigate the midterm outcomes of endovascular repair of traumatic isolated popliteal arterial injury.From january 2012 to february 2020, 46 patients who underwent endovascular repair using viabahn devices for traumatic popliteal arterial injuries were reviewed.The patients were mainly in traffic accidents and had traumatic injuries.Conclusion: endovascular repair of an isolated popliteal artery injury may be a safe and effective alternative treatment in select patients, with acceptable midterm outcomes.5 patients required below-knee amputation owing to irreversible ischemia within 48 hours after endovascular treatment.All of them had class iii acute limb ischemia and a long time interval from trauma to blood flow restoration (>20 hours).6 patients had graft occlusion and underwent reintervention within 30 days.All of them had combined tibial plateau or distal femoral fracture.After endovascular repair, open reduction and internal fixation was performed, and ischemic symptoms developed within 14 days after the orthopedic surgery.The patients were treated with catheter-directed thrombolysis because of intrastent thromboses.One received balloon angioplasty and inline stenting owing to an in-folding stent graft.The symptoms resolved successfully after reintervention in all patients.Including the 6 patients mentioned, a total of 15 patients required reoperation (1 had femorotibial artery bypass, 14 had balloon angioplasty, thrombolysis, and additional stenting) to treat stent graft thrombosis or in-folding during follow-up (36.1 months).5 of them presented with subacute or chronic ischemia within 6 to 9 months after endovascular reintervention and they received a third intervention (one patient with stent graft thrombosis had balloon angioplasty and thrombolysis, in-folding stent graft was identified in four patient, who had bypass surgery and blood flow was restored successfully).Only those requiring reoperation as a result of the alleged in-folding are reportable, but the number of patients is unknown.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
GORE® VIABAHN® ENDOPROSTHESIS
Type of Device
STENT, SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY
Manufacturer (Section D)
W. L. GORE & ASSOCIATES, INC.
1505 n. fourth street
flagstaff AZ 86004
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDICAL ECHO RIDGE B/P
3250 w. kiltie lane
flagstaff AZ 86005
Manufacturer Contact
qiong wang
1505 n. fourth street
flagstaff, AZ 86004
9285263030
MDR Report Key15230975
MDR Text Key297953726
Report Number2017233-2022-03213
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIP
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCH
PMA/PMN Number
P040037
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Literature
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 09/15/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 08/03/2022
Initial Date FDA Received08/16/2022
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received09/03/2022
09/03/2022
Supplement Dates FDA Received09/08/2022
09/15/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient SexMale
-
-