MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3 AXIUM PRIME BARE PL 3D; DEVICE, VASCULAR, FOR PROMOTING EMBOLIZATION
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number APB-1.5-3-3D-ES |
Device Problem
Break (1069)
|
Patient Problems
Foreign Body In Patient (2687); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 08/15/2022 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
Medtronic received information that the coil separated by itself.Used apb-1.5-3-3d-es coil for embolization, after the surgeon opened the package, in the process of pushing the coil, the coil push rod was separated from the coil by itself.The coil remained in patient.It is unknown if it was implanted at the intended location.No medical or surgical intervention is required.The pushwire was not bent or broken.There was no friction or difficulty during delivery.The physician did not reposition the coil or attempt to detach the coil.They did not rotate the delivery pusher during the procedure.Continuous flush was not administered during the procedure.The devices were prepared as indicated in the instructions for use (ifu).The patient was being treated for an unruptured, saccular aneurysm in the internal carotid artery cavernous sinus.The max diameter was 6mm andthe neck diameter was 3.5mm.Patient blood flow and vessel tortuosity was normal.No patient symptoms or complications were associated with the event.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Event Description
|
Additional information received reported that after the coil separated the surgeon reused a guide wire to push the coil into the aneurysm.The coil was implanted in the intended location.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Product analysis: as found condition (condition of returned device): an axium prime coil was returned for analysis within a shipping box; within a sealed tyvek biohazard pouch; within an opened axium prime coil inner pouch and within a dispenser track.Visual inspection/damage location details: the axium prime coil was returned within introducer sheath.The actuator interface, positive load indicator, coupler tube, and break indicator were found to be intact.This is indicative mechanical method detachment was not attempted.No bends or kinks were found with the axium prime coil pushwire.The coin was found to be still against the lumen stop.The implant coil was already detached and not returned.No other anomalies were observed.Testing/analysis (including sem reports): under the microscope, the outer jacket was then removed to gain access to the coin.The coin appeared to be in good condition.The coin was measured to be 0.087mm at 0.063mm which is within specification, 0.095mm at 0.127mm, and 0.096mm at 0.275mm which were within specification.The lumen stop appeared to be visually acceptable.The retainer ring was found to be visually acceptable and measured to be 0.0050¿ which is within specification.Conclusion: based on the analysis performed, the customers report of ¿premature detachment¿ was confirmed as the axium prime was returned with the implant already detached; however, the cause could not be determined.Since the implant coil and included detach element were not returned for analysis, any contributing factors could not be determined.A possible cause for premature detachment is the coil not being retracted in a one-to-one motion with the implant pusher during repositioning.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|