|
Model Number 279702030 |
Device Problem
Break (1069)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 07/25/2022 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Complainant part is expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation but has yet to be received.Without a lot number the device history records review could not be completed.Product was not returned.Based on the information available, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.This complaint will be accounted for and monitored via post market surveillance activities.If additional information is made available, the investigation will be updated as applicable.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Event Description
|
Device report from synthes reports an event in canada as follows: it was reported on (b)(6) 2022, that while prepping the pedicle pathway with a straight thoracic pedicle probe at l5 on the left side, the tip broke off.The instrument may have been experiencing some fatigue at the junction of the tip and shaft.No harm was done and a new instrument was used in its place.As well, two expedium reduction instruments were not working properly as the threads seemed to be stripped and were unable to thread into the reduction sleeve.Over time the threads and these instruments do wear done and strip.These reduction instruments have been in circulation for a very long time and are probably due to be replaced due to regular wear and tear.Surgery was not delay a replacement instrument was brought in and the broken instrument was set aside., the surgery was successfully completed.Fragments were not generated.There was no patient outcome/consequences.This report is for one (1) xpdm thoracic pedicle prb, st.This is report 1 of 2 for complaint (b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If the information is unknown, not available or does not apply, the section/field of the form is left blank.A review of the receiving inspection (ri) for xpdm thoracic pedicle prb, st was conducted identifying that serial number was released in single batch.Batch 1: lot qty units was released on 09 may2018 with no discrepancies.Supplier: norwood medical as a result, the ri identified no issues during the manufacturing and release of this device that could have contributed to the problem reported by the customer.The product was returned to depuy synthes for evaluation.The depuy synthes team conducted a visual inspection of the returned device.Visual analysis of the returned sample revealed that the tip of the xpdm thoracic pedicle prb, st has broken, the broken fragment was not returned.No other issues were observed.A dimensional inspection was not performed for the xpdm thoracic pedicle prb, st due to post manufacturing damage.The observed condition of the device was consistent with a random component failure that may have been caused by exposure to excessive/unintended forces.As part of depuy synthes quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.The overall complaint was confirmed as the observed condition of the xpdm thoracic pedicle prb, st would contribute to the complained device issue.There is no indication that a design or manufacturing issue has caused the complaint condition and hence the root cause cannot be determined.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.Drawing/specifications reviewed: current/ rev k manufactured dimensional inspection: n/a.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|