The meter and test strips were requested for investigation and have not been received at this time.If the product is returned in the future, a follow-up report will be submitted. on a regular basis, coaguchek strips of lots currently valid in the market are tested as part of routine retention testing and the results have passed the internal inspection. per product labeling: "coaguchek method uses human recombinant thromboplastin.Therefore, the comparability to tests using other human recombinant thromboplastins is best, whereas higher deviations can occur with other thromboplastin types.However, those higher differences between thromboplastins of different (rabbit, bovine) origin are not an issue specific for coaguchek assays.Similar differences can be observed when a human recombinant thromboplastin-based laboratory method is compared with several other (rabbit, bovine) laboratory methods." the patient stated that he was unable to test for a month due to errors on the meter.The reporter was advised on the call that if they are unable to test due to an error or the meter not functioning to call roche technical service right away or to contact their physician.Product labeling states: "you may see the following error messages while using the coaguchek xs meter.If you see an error message, first try to correct the problem using the solution described below.If the problem persists, call the roche customer support center at 1-800-428-4674, monday through friday from 7 am to 11 pm est." the patient stated that he received an error 5: product labeling states: "error: blood application error 5 - error applying blood to the test strip.Solution: turn the meter off and remove the test strip.Repeat the test using a new test strip and blood taken from a new fingerstick from a different finger." the patient has anemia with a hematocrit of 23.8%.Product labeling states: "hematocrit ranges between 25-55 % do not significantly affect result." occupation is patient/consumer.The reporter was the patient's son.
|
The initial reporter questioned the inr result from a coaguchek xs meter with serial number (b)(4) that was allegedly within the normal range for a patient who was allegedly not feeling well.On (b)(6) 2022 at 2:56 pm, the meter result was reported to be 2.0 inr.On (b)(6) 2022, the patient reportedly went to the hospital because he was generally not feeling well.The patient was allegedly tested at the hospital using an unknown laboratory method at 7:30 am and the result was reported to be 10.1 inr.The reporter stated that the patient was admitted and was given vitamin k, plasma, and blood transfusion.The physicians reportedly believed that the patient had a bleed.The reporter stated that the inr is now stable and the patient is scheduled for an endoscopy and colonoscopy.The reporter stated that the patient is still in the hospital.The reporter is comparing the 2.0 inr meter result on (b)(6) 2022 at 2:56 pm to the 10.1 inr laboratory result on (b)(6) 2022 at 7:30 am.The reporter stated that the patient was unable to test for a month due to errors on the meter.The reporter stated that they received an error they could not specify and an error 5.The reporter stated that they were told by their physician's nurse that they only needed to test once a month which explains the "big gap" between the last meter result and the event.The therapeutic range was reported to be 2.0-3.0 inr.Multiple attempts were made to gather additional information regarding the patient and to date, further information has not been provided.Examples of information requested include: the patient's current condition.If the patient's alleged bleed was confirmed.If the diagnostics have been performed and the results of these diagnostics.
|