• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SYNTHES GMBH BATTERY OSCILLATOR II FOR BPL II; MOTOR, SURGICAL INSTRUMENT, AC-POWERED

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SYNTHES GMBH BATTERY OSCILLATOR II FOR BPL II; MOTOR, SURGICAL INSTRUMENT, AC-POWERED Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 530.710
Device Problems Material Fragmentation (1261); Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907); Noise, Audible (3273)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 08/29/2022
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy synthes, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.As of this date, the device has not been returned for evaluation; therefore, the reported condition cannot be confirmed and/or duplicated.Udi: (b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported from japan that during a total knee arthroplasty surgical procedure, it was observed that there was an unusual noise coming from the with the battery oscillator device bone saw.The surgeon stopped using it once and when the surgeon checked the oscillator some of the parts were broken and the springs and screws had popped out from the inside.The surgeon stopped using the oscillator in question and used a similar spare device to complete the procedure.The procedure was performed with the attune device and the bone saw.There was a thirty minute delay to the surgical procedure.There was patient involvement.There were no injuries, medical intervention or prolonged hospitalization.All available information has been disclosed.If additional information should become available, a supplemental medwatch will be submitted accordingly.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H4: the date of manufacture has been added.D4: the serial number has been added.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy synthes, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.D4: the serial number has been added udi: (b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy synthes, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H10 additional narrative: the actual device was returned for evaluation.During repair, an evaluation was performed and it was determined that the device was received with a separated saw head and the electric control unit (ecu) did not function.The saw head fell off from the device due to a broken snap-ring and one of the other snap rings was missing.The broken snap-ring was inspected and it is heavily corroded.The device also failed pretests for general condition, check function of device and check oscillation frequency with frequency meter.Therefore, the reported condition was confirmed.The assignable root cause could not be determined.A review of the service history record indicates that the device had been returned previously for the same malfunction.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BATTERY OSCILLATOR II FOR BPL II
Type of Device
MOTOR, SURGICAL INSTRUMENT, AC-POWERED
Manufacturer (Section D)
SYNTHES GMBH
eimattstrasse 3
oberdorf 4436
SZ  4436
Manufacturer Contact
kate karberg
eimattstrasse 3
oberdorf 4436
SZ   4436
3035526892
MDR Report Key15340912
MDR Text Key302932205
Report Number8030965-2022-06300
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GEY
UDI-Device Identifier07611819491847
UDI-Public07611819491847
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
EXEMPT
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 09/01/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number530.710
Device Lot NumberJ101
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 08/29/2022
Initial Date FDA Received09/01/2022
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received09/09/2022
09/16/2022
12/16/2022
Supplement Dates FDA Received09/13/2022
09/23/2022
12/19/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured03/18/2016
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-