BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION EMBOLD FIBERED DETACHABLE COIL SYSTEM; DEVICE, VASCULAR, FOR PROMOTING EMBOLIZATION
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number 83910 |
Device Problems
Break (1069); Difficult to Remove (1528); Material Separation (1562); Material Deformation (2976)
|
Patient Problem
Foreign Body In Patient (2687)
|
Event Date 08/19/2022 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that there was an unretrieved device fragment.A 4mm x 15mm embold fibered detachable coil system was selected for use in a splenic pseudoaneurysm embolization procedure.The splenic artery was moderately tortuous, and there were a lot of issues with base stability.Eventually, a truselect catheter was placed distal to the pseudoaneurysm, and coiling began with 5mm embolds.Next, a 10mm x 20mm embold was placed despite difficulty going around the tortuosity and microcatheter kick back.Some non-boston scientific low-profile packing coils were placed followed by 4-5mm embolds further back.Finally, a 4mm x 15mm embold was positioned, but there was a detachment issue.When the wire between the perforation markers was snapped, the pull wire snapped as well.There was no pull wire to grasp at all.An attempt was made to remove the coil, but the distal end of the delivery wire was kinked and would not come back across the tortuous vessel.The physician ended up cutting the proximal end of the delivery wire until the pull wire was visible.The pull wire was pulled, and the coil was finally released, but it was suspected the proximal coil marker from the polymer shaft was left inside the patient.The procedure was completed.No patient complications were reported.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that there was an unretrieved device fragment.A 4mm x 15mm embold fibered detachable coil system was selected for use in a splenic pseudoaneurysm embolization procedure.The splenic artery was moderately tortuous, and there were a lot of issues with base stability.Eventually, a truselect catheter was placed distal to the pseudoaneurysm, and coiling began with 5mm embolds.Next, a 10mm x 20mm embold was placed despite difficulty going around the tortuosity and microcatheter kick back.Some non-boston scientific low-profile packing coils were placed followed by 4-5mm embolds further back.Finally, a 4mm x 15mm embold was positioned, but there was a detachment issue.When the wire between the perforation markers was snapped, the pull wire snapped as well.There was no pull wire to grasp at all.An attempt was made to remove the coil, but the distal end of the delivery wire was kinked and would not come back across the tortuous vessel.The physician ended up cutting the proximal end of the delivery wire until the pull wire was visible.The pull wire was pulled, and the coil was finally released, but it was suspected the proximal coil marker from the polymer shaft was left inside the patient.The procedure was completed.No patient complications were reported.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device eval by manufacturer: the product was returned to boston scientific for analysis.Returned product consisted of an embold fibered 4x15.The delivery wire and the nitinol shaft were returned outside of the delivery sheath.The returned delivery wire showed that it was not broken at the serration.The coupler showed a slight bend and was still connected to the delivery wire.The pull wire showed a break.The ro marker was still attached to the delivery sheath.The media that was returned showed stretching of the coil.The media review concluded that the coil was inside the patient.The distal coupler was still attached per the image returned.The coupler appeared to be attached to the coil and may have been stretched.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|