• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BIOTRONIK SE & CO. KG LUMAX 740 HF-T PROMRI; CRT-D

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BIOTRONIK SE & CO. KG LUMAX 740 HF-T PROMRI; CRT-D Back to Search Results
Model Number 381462
Device Problem Premature End-of-Life Indicator (1480)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 08/01/2022
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
After an implantation period of approx.104 months, it was reported that the device shows the eos status.The icd was explanted and changed.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Prior to the analysis of the device, the quality documents accompanying the manufacturing process for this icd were re-investigated.All production steps were performed accordingly, and in particular the final acceptance test proved the device functions to be as specified.The device interrogation revealed the eos battery status, detected on (b)(6) 2022.The device was implanted for about 103 months.In a next step, the amount of charge taken from the battery was verified.The battery condition was not as expected.Therefore, the icd was opened and the inner assembly was inspected.The visual inspection of the inner assembly showed no anomalies.In a next step, the electronic module was attached to an external power supply and the eos status was removed with a technical programmer to check the functionality of the electronic module.The measured current consumption was normal and as expected.There was no indication of a malfunction, particularly all therapy functions were available and worked as expected.The battery was sent to the manufacturer for further analysis.The manufacturing records of the battery were inspected, documenting that the battery parameters were within specification during the battery manufacturing.No anomalies were documented during the production process associated with this battery.The visual inspection of the battery did not reveal any external signs of damage.In a next step, the battery was opened for destructive analysis.During the analysis of the inner assembly an elevated internal battery impedance was identified.It is reasonable to assume, that the increased impedance has led to a voltage drop and therefore to the clinical consequence.In conclusion, the device was implanted for about 103 months.The therapeutic functionality of the device was tested with an attached external power supply and proved to be fully functional.Analysis revealed an elevated battery impedance as the root cause of the clinical observation.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LUMAX 740 HF-T PROMRI
Type of Device
CRT-D
Manufacturer (Section D)
BIOTRONIK SE & CO. KG
woermannkehre 1
berlin 12359
Manufacturer Contact
6024 jean road
lake oswego, OR 97035
8772459800
MDR Report Key15422488
MDR Text Key299950975
Report Number1028232-2022-04746
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIK
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
P050023
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 09/09/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date10/31/2014
Device Model Number381462
Device Catalogue NumberSEE MODEL NO.
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 09/14/2022
Initial Date FDA Received09/14/2022
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received02/24/2023
Supplement Dates FDA Received02/24/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/31/2013
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization;
-
-