Model Number 26040XA |
Device Problem
Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
|
Patient Problem
Insufficient Information (4580)
|
Event Date 07/29/2022 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The affected device has been requested for investigation by the manufacturer.Device was not yet returned for investigation.
|
|
Event Description
|
Manufacturer incident report (b)(4) received from the factory in germany: it was reported that there was an issue with the product 26040xa - inner sheath, fixed, for 26040sl.According to the complaint description received by the customer, the inner sheath of a hysteroscope 26040xa was disassembled during surgery and the ceramic terminal fell inside the uterus.This happened during operative hysteroscopy.The incident caused a prolongation of the intervention by 4 hours (which normally lasts 15 minutes) resulting in the precautionary hospitalization of the patient.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Section b2 and b5 was updated with additional information.The corresponding manufacturer's complaint reference number for this case is (b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
The doctor recognized the detachment of the ceramic at the distal part of the inner sheath.It fitted into the right uterine hemi-cavity.The doctor proceeded to attempt to remove it with an equatorial loop but without benefit.Several further attempts had been made to remove the broken part with forceps but without success.A monopolar hysteroscope was introduced to proceed to partial metroplasty to create a larger space and allow the removal of the piece.The piece was finally removed.Internal vigilance reference number for this case is (b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The affected device was returned to the manufacturer on 2022-10-14 for investigation.Visual examination of the affected device revealed that the ceramic beak of the device detached from the shaft.Since the article is already 13 years old and the marking is also difficult to read and almost completely washed out, many reprocessing cycles can be assumed.Due to the high number of reprocessing cycles and chemicals used, the adhesive that attaches the ceramic beak to the shaft has most likely come loose.The device quality and manufacturing history records have been checked for the available lot number and were found to be according to our specifications.The instruction for the use of this device points out the limitation of reprocessing and a preliminary check of the device especially the ceramic beak before usage.
|
|
Event Description
|
Internal karl storz reference number: (b)(4).
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|