• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: APIFIX LTD. MID-C 105; POSTERIOR RATCHETING ROD SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

APIFIX LTD. MID-C 105; POSTERIOR RATCHETING ROD SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Model Number MID-C 105
Device Problems Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method (2017); Migration (4003)
Patient Problem Implant Pain (4561)
Event Date 08/23/2022
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Production process: a review of the dhr demonstrated that the mid-c system was manufactured, tested, and released according to apifix specifications.Surgeon information and analysis: patient (b)(6) index procedure was performed on (b)(6) 2016. on 23-aug-2022, a distributor notified apifix that patient (b)(6) is being scheduled for an implant removal due to persistent pain and curve progression.Apifix reached out to the surgeon for additional information which was provided.The surgeon provided the latest patient x-rays and ct images which showed that the upper screw has migrated cranially and towards the spinal canal.Apifix clinical affairs reviewed the available information from the patient's file.Patient (b)(6) was initially treated out of indication, specifically the patient's pre-op cobb angle was measured at 70° with lateral side-bending measured at 42° (mid-c ifu  - indicated for use in patients having a cobb angle of up to 60 degrees which reduces to less than or equal to 30 degrees on lateral side-bending radiographs).Immediately after the index surgery, the patient's curve was reduced to 33° and at 12 weeks it had progressed to 44°.  the curve progressed and the patient is concerned about the size of the curvature.The surgeon's plan is to revise the patient to fusion.On 25-aug-2022 the surgeon provided additional information and intraoperative photos of the implant.During the explantation of the device it was discovered that the implant had broken despite not being visible in imaging.There were signs of debris all around the area of the implant and soft tissues showed signs of inflammation.It was decided not to reinstrument the patient at the same procedure.  apifix has requested the implant back for further analysis.Risk assessment: reoperation events are a known risk that was assessed and recorded by the product risk management file.At the time of this report, the incident rate for screw misplacement/migration & the incident rate for implant breakage rate due to any reason is in line with the rate reported in the literature for this type of complication as described in the company's clinical evaluation report.The risk of broken rod and the risk of the screw misplacement/migration have been assessed and found to be acceptable.The risks have been quantified, characterized, and documented as acceptable within a full risk assessment.
 
Event Description
Patient (b)(6) index procedure was performed on (b)(6) 2016.On 23-aug-2022, apifix was notified that the surgeon intends on removing patient (b)(6) implant due to "persistent pain and progression beyond the correction range.".
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MID-C 105
Type of Device
POSTERIOR RATCHETING ROD SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
APIFIX LTD.
1 hacarmel st.
kochav yokneam bldg
yokneam ellit, 20692 07
IS  2069207
Manufacturer (Section G)
APIFIX LTD.
1 hacarmel street
kochav yokneam bldg
yokneam elit, 20692 07
IS   2069207
Manufacturer Contact
alan vaisman
1 hacarmel st.
kochav yokneam bldg
yokneam ellit, 20692-07
IS   2069207
MDR Report Key15445356
MDR Text Key306416063
Report Number3013461531-2022-00045
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code QGP
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodePL
PMA/PMN Number
H170001
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Distributor
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 09/19/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/19/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Model NumberMID-C 105
Device Catalogue NumberAFS-105-040
Device Lot NumberAF-07-01-15
Date Manufacturer Received08/23/2022
Date Device Manufactured08/30/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexFemale
-
-