Catalog Number 22445-31 |
Device Problems
Break (1069); Difficult to Remove (1528); Stretched (1601)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 08/31/2022 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the atherectomy procedure was to treat a mildly tortuous, heavily calcified distal femoral in-stent stenosis.The emboshield nav6 barewire was exchanged for a longer barewire to be used.The barewire was advanced to the target lesion and the procedure was completed.At the end of the procedure, when a non-abbott atherectomy device was being removed, it met resistance with the barewire.Once the barewire was removed, it was noted to be damaged badly at the distal end (unraveled, stretched).It was confirmed there were no issues with the use of the emboshield nav6 device.There were no adverse patient effects and no clinically significant delay in the procedure.No additional information was provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The device is expected to be returned for investigation.It has not yet been received.A follow-up report will be submitted with all additional relevant information.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The device was returned for analysis.The reported difficult to remove the barewire from the retrieval catheter and wire separation and damages were confirmed.The reported difficulty to remove the barewire could not be confirmed as the exact conditions encountered by the device during the procedure could not be replicated in a testing environment as it was based on operational circumstances.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no indication of a lot specific product quality issue.Based on the information provided, the difficulty removing, and subsequent stretched tip coils and break were likely due to circumstances of the procedure.In this case, it is likely that clearance between the inner diameter of the jetstream device and outer diameter of the barewire became reduced during use resulting in the devices becoming stuck together causing difficulty to remove, and the reported damage to the tip coils.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.The emboshield nav6 referenced in b5 and d11 is filed under a separate medwatch report number.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the atherectomy procedure was to treat a mildly tortuous, heavily calcified distal femoral in-stent stenosis.The emboshield nav6 barewire was exchanged for a longer barewire to be used.The barewire was advanced to the target lesion and the procedure was completed.At the end of the procedure, when a non-abbott atherectomy device was being removed, it met resistance with the barewire.Once the barewire was removed, it was noted to be damaged badly at the distal end (unraveled, stretched).It was confirmed there were no issues with the use of the emboshield nav6 device.There were no adverse patient effects and no clinically significant delay in the procedure.Subsequent to the initially filed mdr, the account and device analysis confirmed: [when removing the jetstream there was a resistance with the barewire.When attempting to remove the filter and retrieval catheter over the bare wire, it was unable to do so, therefore the barewire was removed altogether with the filter and retrieval catheter as one as device analysis noted the devices were returned frozen together.No additional information was provided.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|