It was reported that, after an internal fixation surgery performed on (b)(6) 2020, patient underwent a revision surgery on (b)(6) 2022 due to a fracture in the femur with no history of significant trauma, and a fracture of the intertan 1.5 10mm x 34cm 125d right, as well.Current health status of the patient is unknown.
|
The device was not returned for evaluation.A x-ray photo was provided which shows a break in the femoral nail which supports the complaint.The clinical/medical investigation.Concluded that, without comparison images we cannot conclude if the fracture in the provided image is a continuation of the previous fracture that was reported as healed.The clinical root cause of the reported fracture cannot be definitively determined based on the information provided.Although we cannot rule out a trauma as a likely contributory factor or continuation of previous fracture is possible even though it was reported as ¿healed¿.Therefore, it cannot be concluded that the reported events were associated with a mal performance of the implant 2 years later.Since the current health status of the patient is unknown, the impact to the patient beyond the reported fracture, revision and subsequent post-operative convalescent period cannot be determined.A review of the production order did not reveal a manufacturing abnormality that could have caused or contributed to the reported incident.A review of complaint history for the part number over the past 12 months and for the batch number based on historical data of the device did not reveal similar events for the listed device.A review of the instructions for use documents for intramedullary nail system revealed in possible adverse effects that cracking or fracture of the implant may occur.Preoperative planning section states that proper type and size of implant must be selected to ensure effective treatment of patients considering factors such as patient¿s size, strength, skeletal characteristics, skeletal health, and general health.Overweight or musculoskeletal deficient or unhealthy patients may create greater loads on implants that may lead to breakage or other failure of the implants.Additionally, postoperative care section warns that early weight bearing substantially increases implant loading and increases the risk of breaking the device.A review of the risk management file revealed this failure mode was previously identified.The anticipated risk level is still adequate.A historical review concluded that there are no prior actions related to this product and event.At this time, we have no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any product specifications at the time of manufacture.Factors that could contribute to the reported event include patient bone quality, post-operative patient condition, abnormal loading of limb.The contribution of the device to the reported incident could be corroborated as the device was broken and it was required a revision surgery.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Without the return of the actual product involved, our investigation could not proceed.Should the device or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.
|