• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ETHICON ENDO-SURGERY, LLC. UNK_ENSEAL G2 ARTICULATING CURVED JAW; ELECTROSURGICAL, CUTTING & COAGULATION & ACCESSORIES

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ETHICON ENDO-SURGERY, LLC. UNK_ENSEAL G2 ARTICULATING CURVED JAW; ELECTROSURGICAL, CUTTING & COAGULATION & ACCESSORIES Back to Search Results
Catalog Number UNK_ENSEAL G2 ARTICULATING CUR
Device Problems Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
Patient Problems Hemorrhage/Bleeding (1888); Insufficient Information (4580)
Event Date 09/21/2022
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Title: a comparative study of an integrated ultrasonic/bipolar sealing device versus an articulating bipolar sealing device for laparoscopic liver surgery authors: m.D¿hondt1, a.-l.Provoost1, c.De meyere1, i.Parmentier2, h.Pottel3 and c.Verslype4 citation: hpb 2021, 23 (s3), s674-s751 the aim of this retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database is to compare the outcome of thunderbeat (tb), an integrated ultrasonic/bipolar sealing device, versus enseal (es), an articulating bipolar sealing device, in lls.Between september 2011 to september 2020, a total of 352 patients who underwent laparoscopic liver surgery (lls), either by using tb (n=105) or es (n=247), were included in the study.Reported complications include bleeding (n=1.2%) and biliary leak (n=1.6%).In conclusion, the integrated ultrasonic/bipolar sealing device is superior compared to the articulating bipolar sealing device in lls in terms of perioperative blood loss without an increase in complications.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Publication year of 2021.Batch # unk.This report is related to a journal article; therefore, no product will be returned for analysis and the manufacturing records cannot be reviewed as the lot/batch number has not been provided.Attempts are being made to obtain the following information.To date no response has been provided.If further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.¿¿¿¿¿¿does the author/surgeon believe that there were any ethicon device deficiencies that caused or contributed to the negative patient outcomes or the death? what was the specific cause of the death(s) in the enseal group (0.8%)? would the author/surgeon be interested in speaking with ethicon medical and engineering team regarding this event? this report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Date sent: 12/9/2022.
 
Event Description
Title: a comparative study of an integrated ultrasonic/bipolar sealing device versus an articulating bipolar sealing device for laparoscopic liver surgery authors: an-lies provoost1 ¿ mathieu d¿hondt1 ¿ edward willems2 ¿ celine de meyere1 ¿ isabelle parmentier3 ¿ anne devooght1 ¿ hans pottel4 ¿ chris verslype5 citation: world j surg (2022); 46:2963¿2972.Https://doi.Org/10.1007/s00268-022-06734-3 the aim of this retrospective study of a prospectively maintained database is to compare an integrated ultrasonic/bipolar sealing devices (sd) versus an articulating bipolar sd in laparoscopic liver surgery (lls).Between december 2013 to september 2020, a total of 352 patients were included in the study: tb (n=105; 64 male and 41 female; median age of 64 [55¿72] years; median bmi of 26.0 [22.6¿29.5]) and es (n=247; 142 male and 105 female; median age of 64 [56¿74] years; median bmi of 25.7 [23.2¿29.4]).The thunderbeat (tb) (olympus europa se & co, hamburg, germany) was used in tb group while enseal (es) (ethicon endo-surgery inc., cincinnati, usa) was used in es group, of which were used for parenchymal transection.The sd were used in combination with cusa (cusa, plainsboro, usa).The monopolar electrocautery and bipolar forceps were used for additional transection and hemostasis.Metal clips and locking polymer clips (hem-o-lok, weck surgical instruments, teleflex medical, durham, usa) were applied on small vessels and bile ducts.Endovascular staplers (endo-gia, medtronic, minneapolis, usa) were used for hepatic veins and large portal pedicles.Bleeding from intrahepatic vessels was handled by absorbable multifilament sutures (vicryl, ethicon, livingstone, uk) or barbed synthetic absorbable monofilament sutures (filbloc, assut europe s.P.A., rome, italy).Hemostatic agents consisted of fibrillar absorbable haemostat (surgicel fibrillartm, ethicon, bridgewater, usa), fibrin sealant patch (tachosil, ethicon, bridgewater, usa), or fibrin glue (tisseel, baxter international, deerfield, usa), which were applied on broad surfaces of diffuse oozing or in expected bleeding sites.A hemostatic matrix (surgiflo, ethicon, bridgewater, usa) was used for aggressive bleeding in a localized site.Reported complications include intraoperative bleeding (n=9), postoperative bleeding (n=3), and biliary leak (n=4).In conclusion, the integrated ultrasonic/bipolar sd is superior to the articulating bipolar sd in lls for intraoperative bl without an increase in complications.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4) date sent: 7/5/2023 additional information was obtained: does the author/surgeon believe that there were any ethicon device deficiencies or malfunctions that caused or contributed to the negative patient outcomes or the death? what was the specific cause of the death(s) in the enseal group (0.8%)? would the author/surgeon be interested in speaking with ethicon medical and engineering team regarding this event? no changes to the file or the reportability were changed with the new information.Received full article.See attached.B3, b5.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UNK_ENSEAL G2 ARTICULATING CURVED JAW
Type of Device
ELECTROSURGICAL, CUTTING & COAGULATION & ACCESSORIES
Manufacturer (Section D)
ETHICON ENDO-SURGERY, LLC.
475 calle c
guaynabo 00969
Manufacturer (Section G)
ETHICON ENDO-SURGERY, LLC.
475 calle c
guaynabo 00969
Manufacturer Contact
orla o'mahony
475 calle c
guaynabo 
329348013
MDR Report Key15488474
MDR Text Key300650482
Report Number3005075853-2022-06430
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GEI
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeBE
PMA/PMN Number
K072177
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Literature,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 09/26/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/26/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberUNK_ENSEAL G2 ARTICULATING CUR
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received06/08/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-