Model Number PVS23 |
Device Problems
Leak/Splash (1354); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problem
Aortic Valve Insufficiency/ Regurgitation (4450)
|
Event Date 08/31/2022 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
The manufacturer was informed that on (b)(6) 2022, a pvs23 was attempted to be implanted, but leak occurred.As such, the pvs valve was explanted and inspiris valve was implanted instead.No further information is available at this time.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The manufacturing and material records for the perceval heart valve, model #icv1209, s/n # (b)(4), as they pertain to the reported event, were retrieved and reviewed by the manufacturer¿s quality engineering.The results confirmed that this valve satisfied all material, visual, and performance standards required for a (model #icv1209) perceval heart valve at the time of manufacture and release.The manufacturer is following up to retrieve further information regarding the event and device involved.A follow up report will be provided upon receipt of further information.The device will not be returned by site.
|
|
Event Description
|
The manufacturer was informed that on (b)(6) 2022, a pvs23 was attempted to be implanted, but leak occurred.As such, the pvs valve was explanted and inspiris valve size 21 was implanted instead.Based on the further information received, the concomitant procedure was cabg.The patient had infection, and the product was discarded at the hospital.Based on the medical judgment received, the device relationship to the event was ¿probably not related".Furthermore, patient valve was type 0 bicuspid and perceval could not be implemented as it was supposed to be.Reportedly, about 30 min was added to the cross-clamp time and bypass time, patient remained stable through the procedure, there was no impact on the patient, and outcome was good.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Based on the medical judgment received, there was probably no relationship between the device and the reported event.Furthermore, it was mentioned that the patient valve was type 0 bicuspid and perceval could not be implemented as it was supposed to be.As such, cause of the event was reasonably attributed to the patient's anatomy.H3 other text : device was discarded at the hospital.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|