• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC MX40 2.4 GHZ SMART HOPPING

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC MX40 2.4 GHZ SMART HOPPING Back to Search Results
Model Number 865351
Device Problem Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method (2017)
Patient Problem Insufficient Information (4580)
Event Date 09/13/2022
Event Type  Death  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4) will address issue with mx40 and (b)(4) will address issue with piic.A follow-up report will be submitted once the investigation is complete.
 
Event Description
The customer reported that the telepack mx40 transferred from different zones in picix not done properly by customer resulted in monitor loss.The nursing staff was attempting to monitor patients with mx40 to the central station.While troubleshooting the issue, the patient expired while not being monitored.
 
Event Description
The customer reported that the telepack mx40 transferred from different zones in picix not done properly by customer resulted in monitor loss.The nursing staff was attempting to monitor patients with mx40 to the central station.While troubleshooting the issue, the patient expired while not being monitored.A good faith effort (gfe) was sent to obtain additional information regarding the issue.Per gfe response, the customer was undergoing a picix rev b to rev c upgrade the day the incident happened; due to the upgrade and downtime caused by the upgrade, the customer biomed team moved 6 mx40s from one unit to another.However, the device transfer was not done properly, and they did not assign a proper rf id code.Also, the biomed did not confirm with the fse and returned the units (mx40s) to the nurses.The nursing team was not able to use and assign the tele packs in the central station and the patient.While the nursing team was troubleshooting the mx40 connection to the central stations the patient incidents occurred.When the fse philips team investigated the problem, it was noted that the mx40 tele packs were not configured to the correct rf access code, and it was confirmed by the customer biomed team that the mistake was made by their own team members.Further, it was stated neither the mx40 or piic contributed to the patient death, but it would be considered a near miss.The nursing team was troubleshooting the connection from the mx40 to the central station when the patient incident occurred.The pic ix device involved in this event is report in mfr number 1218950-2022-00901.
 
Event Description
The customer during a picix rev b to rev c upgrade, the customer biomed transferred 6 mx40s from 3b-cardiology unit to 3b-icu unit.During the transfer the customer did not match the rf access code in the mx40s with that of the picix, so the device and the its system were in different rf access codes.A philips field service engineer (fse) went to the customer site.The engineer determined that the issue was associated with the customer underdoing a picix rev b to rev c upgrade.The customer biomed team moved 6 mx40s from the 3b-cardiology unit to 3b-icu unit.The devices were not properly assigned a proper rf id code.Also, the biomed did not confirm with the fse and returned the units, mx40s, to the nurses.The nursing team was not able to use and assign the tele packs in the central station and the patient.While the nursing team was troubleshooting the mx40 connection to the central stations the patient incidents occurred.When the fse philips team investigated the problem it was noted that the mx40 tele packs were not configured to the correct rf access code, and it was confirmed by the customer biomed team that the mistake was made by of their team members.The fse confirmed that the mx40 did not contribute to the patient death, and the customer biomed team confirmed that the mistake was made by their team members.The fse also confirmed that the telemetry units were configured to the correct rf access code after the reported incident.The device was in use on a patient at the time of event.There was an adverse event reported; however, the device did not cause or contribute to the event reported.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MX40 2.4 GHZ SMART HOPPING
Type of Device
MX40 2.4 GHZ SMART HOPPING
Manufacturer (Section D)
PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC
3000 minuteman road
andover MA 01810
Manufacturer (Section G)
PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC
3000 minuteman road
andover MA 01810
Manufacturer Contact
jeanne ahearn
222 jacobs st
cambridge, MA 02141
6172455900
MDR Report Key15520582
MDR Text Key300986261
Report Number1218950-2022-00898
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DSI
UDI-Device Identifier00884838082243
UDI-Public00884838082243
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCA
PMA/PMN Number
K113125
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility
Reporter Occupation Biomedical Engineer
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/30/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number865351
Device Catalogue Number865351
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received11/17/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Death;
Patient Age94 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-