• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SHIRAKAWA OLYMPUS CO., LTD. EVIS EXERA II ULTRASOUND GASTROVIDEOSCOPE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SHIRAKAWA OLYMPUS CO., LTD. EVIS EXERA II ULTRASOUND GASTROVIDEOSCOPE Back to Search Results
Model Number GF-UCT180
Device Problems Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material (2944); Scratched Material (3020); Failure to Clean Adequately (4048)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The device was returned to olympus for evaluation and the customer¿s allegation of leakage was confirmed.The allegations of image freezing and control knob being loose were not confirmed.During evaluation of device, it was noted switch 1, 2 and 3 did not function, suction cylinder was shaved, nozzle was clogged, angle wires were stretched, bending tube was deformed, bending section cover adhesive was detached, objective lens was scratched, light guide lens was dirty, distal end was scratched, light guide cover glass was dirty, control body switch was corroded, switch box was discolored, scope connector cover was scratched, grip was scratched, color ring was cracked, light guide bundle was broken, channel tube was damaged, control unit and scope connector was corroded from water leakage, ultrasonic cable was damaged and acoustic lens was scratched.The investigation is ongoing.A supplemental report will be submitted upon completion of the investigation or if any additional information is provided by the user facility.
 
Event Description
The customer reported to olympus, the evis exera ii ultrasound gastrovideoscope image auto freeze and released during an unknown diagnostic procedure.The procedure was completed successfully and there was no report of patient harm associated with this event.Via a call, the engineer observed air/water leakage from the suction channel and angulation control knob felt too loose.During inspection of the returned device, forceps elevator had foreign material and acoustic lens had a scratch which reached to glue layer.This mdr is being submitted to capture the reportable malfunction found during device evaluation.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being supplemented to provide additional information based on the legal manufacturer's final investigation.A review of the device history record found no deviations that could have caused or contributed to the reported issue.It has been over 9 years since the subject device was manufactured.Based on the results of the investigation, the root cause of the foreign material was unable to be identified.Additionally, it¿s likely the scratched acoustic lenses were due to physical stress such as falling or tapping.The root cause of the physical stress to the scratched acoustic lens was unable to be identified.The events can be prevented by following the instructions for use which state: ¿chapter 5 reprocessing: general policy.5.3 precautions: warning: all channels of the endoscope, including the elevator wire channel and balloon channel, must be cleaned and high-level disinfected or sterilized during every reprocessing cycle, even if the channels were not used during the previous patient procedure.Otherwise, insufficient cleaning and disinfection or sterilization of the endoscope may pose an infection control risk to the patient and/or operators performing the next procedure with the endoscope.¿ ¿important information ¿ please read before use.Warnings and cautions.Warning: do not strike, hit, or drop the endoscope¿s distal end, insertion tube, bending section, control section, universal cord, or endoscope connector.Also, do not bend, pull, or twist the endoscope¿s distal end, insertion tube, bending section, control section, universal cord, or endoscope connector with excessive force.The endoscope may be damaged and could cause patient injury, burns, bleeding, and/or perforations.It could also cause parts of the endoscope to fall off inside the patient.Caution: do not coil the insertion tube or universal cord with a diameter of less than 12 cm.Equipment damage can result.Do not attempt to bend the endoscope¿s insertion section with excessive force.Otherwise, the insertion section may be damaged.Do not apply shock to the distal end of the insertion section, particularly the ultrasound transducer and the objective lens surface at the distal end.Visual abnormalities may result.Do not squeeze the bending section forcefully.The covering of the bending section may stretch or break and cause water leaks.¿ olympus will continue to monitor field performance for this device.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EVIS EXERA II ULTRASOUND GASTROVIDEOSCOPE
Type of Device
ULTRASOUND GASTROVIDEOSCOPE
Manufacturer (Section D)
SHIRAKAWA OLYMPUS CO., LTD.
3-1 okamiyama
odakura, nishigo-mura
nishishirakawa-gun, fukushima 961-8 061
JA  961-8061
Manufacturer Contact
masaharu hirose
3-1 okamiyama
odakura, nishigo-mura,
nishishirakawa-gun, fukushima 961-8-061
JA   961-8061
426422891
MDR Report Key15546968
MDR Text Key306453461
Report Number3002808148-2022-02797
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code ODG
UDI-Device Identifier04953170341793
UDI-Public04953170341793
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeIN
PMA/PMN Number
K093395
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility
Reporter Occupation Biomedical Engineer
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 12/06/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberGF-UCT180
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer09/06/2022
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 09/06/2022
Initial Date FDA Received10/05/2022
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received11/16/2022
Supplement Dates FDA Received12/06/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured05/29/2013
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-