• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. RUBY COIL LP; HCG, KRD

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. RUBY COIL LP; HCG, KRD Back to Search Results
Catalog Number RBYLP0304
Device Problems Break (1069); Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 09/14/2022
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure in the gastroduodenal artery (gda) using ruby coil lps and a lantern delivery microcatheter (lantern).During the procedure, after advancing a ruby coil lp into the target location, the physician decided to reposition the lantern.Therefore, the ruby coil lp was removed out from the microcatheter.Subsequently, while retracing the coil back into the introducer sheath, the physician experienced resistance and, consequently, the ruby coil lp had detached from the pusher assembly.The physician then advanced a new ruby coil lp to the target location; however, the physician decided to remove the ruby coil lp to reposition the lantern.While retracting the ruby coil lp through the lantern, the physician experienced resistance and the ruby coil lp unintentionally detached inside the lantern.The procedure was completed using additional ruby coil lps and a new lantern.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The device has been returned and the investigation results are pending.A follow up mdr will be submitted upon completion of the device investigation.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Evaluation of the returned ruby coil lp confirmed that the embolization coil was detached.Further evaluation of the device revealed kinks on the pusher assembly this damage typically occurs due to advancement against resistance.Based on the reported complaint, the ruby lp was advanced through a lantern microcatheter.The lantern microcatheter inner diameter (id) is larger than intended for advancement of the ruby coil lp and likely caused the resistance experienced during the procedure.If the ruby coil lp is retracted against resistance, the embolization coil may detach.The detached embolization coil was not returned for evaluation.Penumbra coils are visually inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.H3 other text: placeholder.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
RUBY COIL LP
Type of Device
HCG, KRD
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer Contact
veronica farris
one penumbra place
alameda, CA 94502
5107483200
MDR Report Key15565392
MDR Text Key303402452
Report Number3005168196-2022-00462
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HCG
UDI-Device Identifier00815948021778
UDI-Public815948021778
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K192955
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/01/2005,10/31/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received10/07/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberRBYLP0304
Device Lot NumberF99157
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer09/20/2022
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report Sent to FDA01/01/2005
Date Report to Manufacturer01/10/2005
Date Manufacturer Received10/06/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/27/2020
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age76 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-