The information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.The device has not been returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.A lot history review (lhr) of redx4173 showed one other similar product complaint(s) from this lot number.
|
H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
It was reported the picc's hub ruptured, causing phlebitis at puncture site.10/04/2022: add info received: was there a need for medical and/or surgical intervention to treat phlebitis (examinations, surgery, medication administration, etc.)? (detail) not.Has there been blood or chemotherapy exposure to mucous membranes or skin? if yes, were post-exposure prophylactic actions necessary? (ex.: tests, retrovirals, etc.); yes, patient skin without the need for prophylaxis.Is the amount correct (01)? yes.How and when did you observe the rupture? (eg during infusion, during implantation, removal, etc.); it was observed due to humidity in the place.What medication was being administered? saline solution was being administered to maintain access.What is the volume of the syringe used for infusion? 10 ml.What type of catheter fixator was being used? occluded with transparent film, fixed according to institutional protocol.What is the implant date? on (b)(6) 2022.Has the device been removed? if yes, what is the explant date? yes, on (b)(6) 2022.What was the puncture site (arm, vessel, etc.)? picc inserted into the saphenous vein.What is the patient's sex, weight and age? female, 2870 grams and 2 months.What treatment was the patient undergoing? acute viral bronchiolitis and pneumonia.Is there any relevant history or concomitant therapy? no.Are there radiographic images or other tests done? no.Was there an embolism or component separation? if yes, how was it resolved? no.
|