ST. JUDE MEDICAL TACTICATH¿ CONTACT FORCE ABLATION CATHETER, SENSOR ENABLED¿ BID CURVE D-D; CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS, CARDIAC ABLATION, FOR TREATMENT OF ATRIAL FIBRILLATION
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number A-TCSE-DD |
Device Problem
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problems
Stroke/CVA (1770); Paralysis (1997)
|
Event Date 09/15/2022 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
After an atrial fibrillation procedure, the patient had a cerebral infarction in the afternoon of the same day, and as of the week of the 19th, the patient was still paralyzed, and the attending physician judged that the paralysis would remain.During the atrial fibrillation procedure, there were two times when the resistance exceeded 150 ohms during rf delivery and rf delivery was stopped, but there was no change in the patient's condition or vitals, and the act was appropriately controlled at about 300, and thrombus was not confirmed.The catheter was replaced and the procedure was completed with no adverse consequences to the patient.The hospital discarded the reported catheter.
|
|
Event Description
|
After an atrial fibrillation procedure, the patient had a cerebral infarction in the afternoon of the same day, and as of the week of the 19th, the patient was still paralyzed in the lower body, and the attending physician judged that the paralysis would remain.During the atrial fibrillation procedure, there were two times when the resistance exceeded 150 ohms during rf delivery and rf delivery was stopped, but there was no change in the patient's condition or vitals, and the act was appropriately controlled at about 300, and thrombus was not confirmed.The catheter was replaced and the procedure was completed with no adverse consequences to the patient.The hospital discarded the reported catheter.A transesophageal echocardiogram was performed preoperatively and there was no patient history of cva that could lead to thrombosis.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
An event of stroke was reported.The results of the investigation are inconclusive since the device was not returned for analysis.In addition, no log files were received.The device history record was reviewed to ensure that each manufacturing and inspection operation was performed.Based on the information received, the cause of the reported incident could not be conclusively determined.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|