Model Number 72200616 |
Device Problems
Mechanical Problem (1384); Overheating of Device (1437)
|
Patient Problems
Insufficient Information (4580); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 09/27/2022 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that a mdu´s shaver was giving a blade stall error and its handle was getting very hot.It is unknown whether the event happened during surgery, if there was patient involvement, if there was a back-up device available or if there was a delay.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Internal complaint reference: (b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H3, h6: the reported device was not returned to the designated complaint unit for independent evaluation, thus visual inspection and functional testing could not be performed.A review of device records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specifications upon release for distribution.A complaint history review found similar reported events.A risk management review found that the reported failure was documented appropriately, and there were no indications to suggest the anticipated risk is not adequate.There was no relationship found between the device and the reported event.The complaint was not confirmed.Please refer to the instructions for use for recommendations on proper use of the device and potential troubleshooting methods to prevent future reoccurrence of the reported event.No containment or corrective actions are recommended at this time.If the product associated with this event is returned at a future date, this investigation will be reopened for evaluation.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H10: internal complaint reference: (b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during set-up for a shoulder arthroscopy, a mdu´s shaver was giving a blade stall error and its handle was getting very hot.There was a back-up device available and no delay was reported.No injuries took place because of the device´s temperature.No patient involvement.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Internal complaint reference: (b)(4).H10 h3, h6: the reported device was received for evaluation.There was no relationship found between the returned device and the reported event a visual inspection was performed on the exterior of product and no physical damage was observed.A functional evaluation was performed on the returned device and no overheating or mechanical problem was found during testing.A review of device records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specification upon release for distribution.A complaint history review found similar reported events.A risk management review found that the reported failure was documented appropriately, and there were no indications to suggest the anticipated risk is not adequate.The complaint was not confirmed and the root cause could not be determined since the reported malfunction could not be duplicated during the product evaluation process.Factors that could have contributed to the reported event include a failure of a concomitant device.Please refer to the instructions for use for recommendations on proper use of the device and potential troubleshooting methods to prevent future reoccurrence of the reported event.No containment or corrective actions are recommended at this time.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|