The customer stated that on approximately on (b)(6) 2022, the mx40 did not alarm as expected and the patient was not able to be resuscitated and died.The clinical application specialist (cas) and field service engineer (fse) were consulted and determined that the logs were pulled but not analyzed as they were not requested by anyone initially.The cas did spend two days on site to review workflow and settings.All settings as expected and correct and the equipment behaved as expected.The customer was unable to provide further information to the fse or the cas on patient details or product information.Based on the onsite visit by the cas, the mx40 was behaving as expected and was not sent in for bench repair or had any further work done on it.The device per cas was working as expected, not a product malfunction.
|