This report has been identified as b.Braun internal report number (b)(4).The complaint is still under investigation.A follow-up report will be provided, as soon as investigation has been completed.Note: this report is being filed for an item number that is not sold in the united states, however similar items are sold in the united states by b.Braun medical, inc.
|
This report has been identified as b.Braun internal report number (b)(4).Summary of root cause analysis: received 1picture of used introcan safety pur 24g, 0.7x19mm-ap.Based on the picture received, the cannula has not been withdrawn and the safety clip is still inside the catheter hub.The capillary was filled with blood which confirmed secondary flash back and it is observed that the capillary tip had broken off.It is reported the other part of the capillary had remained in patient's vein.Based on the picture receive the area of the broken capillary was not clear.Since no sample have been returned the investigation will be based on the receive picture.The in-line test equipment is subject of a frequent calibration and a regular verification related to its proper function.Herewith potential malfunctions of the systems would be detected in-time and would be mitigated.Beside the automated 100% in-line test equipment, independent in-process quality controls and final controls on a random sample basis will be conducted by different teams on a regular basis within the production process.Herewith a systematic product defect would be detected.Tear off capillary most likely not appear to be attributed by manufacturing process as the defect is able to be detected and reject by the in-line vision system.Damages induced after assembly process is not possible since the catheter had been protected with protective cap.The actual sample involved in the event was not available for evaluation.Without the actual sample and due to low image quality, the detailed defect feature was unable to be determined.Hence, this complaint will be concluded as not confirmed as communicated in ifu, warning section stated that: after withdrawal, do not reintroduce the steel needle into the catheter, as the latter may be cut off, leading to catheter embolism.Device history record (dhr): complaint batch is unknown but provided two batch numbers 22c24g8315 22c22g8316 now in the facility inventory for g24.Reviewed the dhr of the possible batch 22c24g8315/4251601-03 and 22c22g8316/4251601-03, no abnormality observed during in-process and at final control inspection.Note: this report is being filed for an item number that is not sold in the united states, however similar items are sold in the united states by b.Braun medical, inc.
|