• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: INTEGRA - PRINCETON DURASEAL, UNKNOWN; DURASEAL CRANIAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

INTEGRA - PRINCETON DURASEAL, UNKNOWN; DURASEAL CRANIAL Back to Search Results
Catalog Number XXX-DURASEAL
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Cerebrospinal Fluid Leakage (1772); Headache (1880); Nausea (1970)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
An investigation has been initiated based on the reported information.Upon completion of the investigation, a follow-up report will be submitted.
 
Event Description
This is 2 of 2 reports for case 4 in the article (duraseal), which is linked to mfg report number 1121308-2022-00107: interdisciplinary neurosurgery 16 (2019) published an article: "treatment of postoperative recurrent cerebrospinal fluid leak with pseudomeningocele formation using temporary epidural drain." objective: treatment of cerebrospinal fluid (csf) leak with pseudo meningocele formation can be challenging; especially when attempts to repair it fail.In this paper the authors present four cases in which the problem was fixed using temporary epidural drain.Patients and methods: four patients were treated with this approach over the last 15 years.One patient had cranio­cervical decompression for chiari malformation with two attempts to fix the csf leak after the initial operation; two patients had one attempt at operative repair of the leak after the initial operation; and one patient had an attempt to repair of the leak during the initial procedure.Epidural drains were placed percutaneously under local anesthesia.Results: within 2­-3 days the wounds were dry and flat.After one week the drains were removed.None of the patients had recurrence of the leak.There was no complication from the drain placement.Conclusion: placement of the epidural catheter is a simple and minimally invasive procedure that solved a complex problem in these four patients.Considering the simplicity of this procedure it is worthwhile trying it prior to considering reoperation.Case 4 a 55-year male presented with pain radiating into left leg with weak dorsiflexion.Mri show lateral recess stenosis at l5-sl level on the left side.A laminectomy at ls and decompression of the left lateral recess was performed.There was csf leak upon removal of the ligamentum flavum.The dura had shredded appearance with several small leaking spots.It was covered with duragen and duraseal.Valsalva maneuver was negative for leak.Patient was kept on bed rest for three days and then ambulated.He had no motor weakness and the wound was dry and flat.He was sent home.Seven days later he was readmitted with severe back pain, headache and nausea.His wound was bulging and ct scan showed large fluid collection in the epidural space that extended to the subcutaneous tissue.Epidural drainage protocol was initiated.This resulted in good resolution of the csf leak without further complication.The patient was discharged on day eight.At four-month follow-up his wound was dry and flat, he was asymptomatic except for low back pain, and he had good motor function.Mri showed small localized fluid collection posterior to the spinal canal without outward tracking of the fluid.Https:/ /doi.Org/10.1016/j.Inat.2018.11.006.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Duraseal was not returned for evaluation and lot number information has not been provided; therefore, an evaluation of the device could not be performed, and device history record (dhr) could not be reviewed.However, all lots are reviewed to meet quality criteria before they are released.The root cause of the reported issue could not be determined.Per the dfmea, potential causes of failure include: performance, sealing dura, application - gel delivery, solution mixing and coverage.The risk remains acceptable per the risk analysis.If additional relevant information becomes available in the future, this complaint will be reopened, and the respective evaluation performed.Trends will be monitored for this and similar issues.At present, we consider this complaint to be closed.
 
Event Description
N/a.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
DURASEAL, UNKNOWN
Type of Device
DURASEAL CRANIAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
INTEGRA - PRINCETON
1100 campus road
1100 campus road
princeton NJ
Manufacturer (Section G)
INTEGRA - PRINCETON
1100 campus road
none
princeton NJ
Manufacturer Contact
vivian nelson
1100 campus drive
princeton, NJ 
6099362319
MDR Report Key15686572
MDR Text Key302558818
Report Number3003418325-2022-00028
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NQR
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
P040034
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Literature
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/27/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received10/27/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberXXX-DURASEAL
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received01/20/2023
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age55 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-