The customer reported that during a patient procedure, using a glidescope bflex 5.8 single-use bronchoscope, the tip broke off and remained lodged inside the patient's endotracheal tube (ett).An emergent reintubation of the patient was performed.No harm to the patient was reported.Upon follow-up communication with the customer, it was reported that the glidescope bflex 5.8 single-use bronchoscope was lubricated with medline lubrication jelly and was inserted into a covidien shiley hi-lo oral/nasal tracheal tube cuffed size 8.0 mm.The customer reported the bronchoscope had been inserted and retracted at least twice inside the ett.The initial retraction was due to the suction becoming clogged.The customer was able to clear the suction and reinserted the bronchoscope into the ett.During the second retraction of the glidescope bflex 5.8 single-use bronchoscope from the ett the tip had separated near the base of the ett.
|
Additional evaluation of the returned glidescope bflex 5.8 single-use bronchoscope was performed by a verathon sustaining engineering representative.Upon visual inspection of the device, the engineer noted that the camera assembly and distal coupler were missing, the bundle wire was severed, the distal tip sheath was ripped, and the working channel was stretched out.The proximal coupler and proximal tip sheath were intact and there was no evidence of proximal tip sheath roll back.The rib of the articulating tip above the proximal coupler also appeared damaged.A possible conclusion for the damage found to the bronchoscope could have been caused by regions inside the ett used which may not have been smooth.During the bronchoscope maneuvering in the ett the bronchoscope tip sheath may have sustained damage initiating a tear.The exposed metal observed may have gotten caught on the edges of the ett preventing it from either advancing smoothly through the bronchoscope or retracting appropriately.It is possible that the bronchoscope was pulled forcibly when attempting to retrieve/dislodge it from the ett causing the bronchoscope tip sheath to tear further, stretching the working channel, and eventually fraying the working channel and severing it and its wire bundle.Thus, resulting in the observed separation of the bronchoscope camera subassembly unit at the distal coupler.While the exact root cause of the reported issue could not be fully determined, based on the identified damage found during the investigation, the most plausible cause of failure for the bronchoscope was damage caused to the bronchoscope while attempting to maneuver it inside the ett.The distal tip had most likely separated due to forcible attempt(s) while attempting to retrieve the bronchoscope from the ett.At this time corrective action is not required.Verathon will continue to monitor for any ongoing trends.
|