Model Number 101-9812 |
Device Problem
Material Integrity Problem (2978)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 10/07/2022 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during an indirect decompression (id) spacer implant procedure, the implant broke damaging the spindle cap.This event occurred after a few sagittal wiggle applications where the physician used excessive force while rotating the driver during deployment.The implant was properly connected to the inserter and there did not appear to be any obstructions causing resistance.A new spacer of a different size was used to successfully complete the procedure.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during an indirect decompression (id) spacer implant procedure, the implant broke damaging the spindle cap.This event occurred after a few sagittal wiggle applications where the physician used excessive force while rotating the driver during deployment.The implant was properly connected to the inserter and there did not appear to be any obstructions causing resistance.A new spacer of a different size was used to successfully complete the procedure.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Correction made to block b2.Device analysis performed on the returned indirect decompression spacer revealed that the spindle cap was completely sheared off from the implant body.Objective evidence from the field confirmed the physician applied excessive force while rotating the driver during deployment which resulted in the detachment of the spindle cap.A product labeling review identified that the device was used per the instructions for use (ifu)/product label.Additionally, device breakage can occur when used with forced deployment and is noted within the ifu as a potential complication associated with use of the device.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|