Coloplast has not been provided any corroborating evidence to verify the information contained in this report.Without the benefit of examination and testing, coloplast is precluded from commenting on the condition of the device or the cause of the occurrence.Should additional facts prompt us to alter or supplement any information or conclusions contained in the original mdr or in any prior supplemental reports, a follow-up report will be submitted.
|
As reported to coloplast, though not verified, legal representative stated the patient with this device experienced vaginal bleeding, dyspareunia with deep penetration, vaginal discharge, chronic pelvic pain, pelvic adhesions, perineal pain, device exposure and erosion, severe stress urinary incontinence, bacterial vaginosis, monilial vaginitis, tenderness at device erosion, right hip pain, concerned about infected device, retained suture and pain in the obturator fascia bilaterally.Patient had a diagnostic laparoscopy with lysis of pelvic adhesions under general anesthesia.Patient had a bilateral oophorectomy with excision of sub urethral device under general anesthesia.Patient had continued left side pain where part of the device was not removed and a small epithelialized canal where the device was removed.Patient had a small infection near obturator canal on her left obturator where some device material was left.Patient had another explantation of the device.
|