BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION LYNX SYSTEM; MESH, SURGICAL, SYNTHETIC, UROGYNECOLOGIC, FOR STRESS URINARY INCONTINENCE, RETR
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Catalog Number 850-300 |
Device Problem
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problems
Prolapse (2475); Urinary Incontinence (4572)
|
Event Date 08/15/2011 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The exact event onset date is unknown.The provided event date of (b)(6) 2011 was chosen as a best estimate based on the date of the removal surgery.The complainant was unable to provide the suspect device lot number; therefore, the lot expiration and device manufacture dates are unknown.This event was reported by the patient's legal representation.The implanting surgeon is dr.(b)(6).The revision surgeon is dr.(b)(6).(b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that a lynx system was implanted during a suburethral mesh sling procedure performed on (b)(6) 2004 for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence and hypermobile urethra.A careful inspection with the bladder distended revealed no evidence of compromise of the bladder.The patient was able to be awakened and taken to recovery room in a good condition.On (b)(6) 2011, the patient underwent a removal of tension-free vaginal tape and anterior and posterior colporrhaphy procedures.Her preoperative diagnosis includes stress urinary incontinence, anterior and posterior pelvic organ prolapse, and failed sling procedure.Her postoperative diagnosis includes stress urinary incontinence with failed sling procedure, anterior and posterior, pelvic organ prolapse stage 2.The mesh was encountered at approximately one centimeter below the urethral meatus.Tags were applied to the edges of the mesh and the mesh was carefully dissected in the directed of the genitourinary membrane initially to the patient's right and a three-centimeter graft was removed.Similar procedure was performed on the left and three and a half centimeters graft was removed from this side.The bleeding was minimal and well-controlled with cautery and surgifoam.Vaginal packing was inserted at the completion of the procedure.Rectal exam was performed and no evidence of suture was noted penetrating rectal mucosa.The patient tolerated the procedure well and was taken to the recovery room awake and in stable condition.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|