• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ARJOHUNTLEIGH, INC. MAXXAIR ETS; MATTRESS, AIR FLOTATION, ALTERNATING PRESSURE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ARJOHUNTLEIGH, INC. MAXXAIR ETS; MATTRESS, AIR FLOTATION, ALTERNATING PRESSURE Back to Search Results
Model Number 47129
Device Problems Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993); Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problem Fall (1848)
Event Date 10/14/2022
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The investigation is in progress.Conclusions will be provided within the follow-up report once the investigation is completed.
 
Event Description
Following the information provided the patient was discovered by the nurse laying on the floor of the room.As per the information provided the mattress was "overinflated" on one side and the patient fell out of the bed.The bed side rails were locked in raised position.The patient was transferred to a house frame.The customer stated that the patient might have sustained a head injury, however this information was not confirmed.Further attempts to contact the customer and obtain additional details about the outcome were unsuccessful.The patient was scheduled for discharge 3 days after the event.There is no indication of serious injury sustained.
 
Event Description
Following the information provided, the patient fell from the maxxair ets mattress placed on the citadel plus bed.No serious injury was sustained.An arjo service consultant received an allegation of the mattress over-inflation on one side of the bed.The charge nurse stated that the patient was found lying on the floor with a possible head injury, after the alleged fall over the left side rail.Allegedly, the side rails were in upright position and the backrest section was set to 30 degrees at that time.The bed was taken out of use.During gathering information in the carried-out investigation, the customer did not respond to the questions regarding the confirmation of the patient¿s injury and the possible outcome of the injury.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
No malfunction was found during the bed and mattress evaluation at the customer¿s site.Furthermore, upon assets returning to the service center an in depth quality functional check was completed by the field service technician with no faults found.The cause of the fall cannot be established due to the patient being found by a caregiver on the floor, and allegedly all side rails were in the up position at the time of the incident.Furthermore, the device (mattress and bed frame) evaluation did not reveal any malfunction and it was working per specifications, therefore it was not possible to confirm the reported issue - mattress overinflation to one side.The fall is unlikely to occur when the side rails are in full upright position as indicated by the maxxair ets instruction for use (310115-ah): ¿it is recommended that side rails (if used) be locked in the full upright position when the patient is unattended.Make sure a capable patient knows how to get out of bed safely (and, if necessary, how to release the side rails) in case of fire or other emergency.¿; ¿warning: use or non-use of restraints, including side rails, can be critical to patient safety.Serious or fatal injury can result from (¿) non-use (potential patient falls) of side rails or other restraints.¿ additionally, ifu instructs to: ¿consider individual patient size, position (relative to the top of the side rail) and patient condition in assessing fall risk.¿ based on the available information it could not be concluded what caused the patient fall in the complained scenario.The device was used for patient treatment when the failure occurred.No malfunction was found on the device and it was working as intended.This complaint is deemed reportable due to the patient's fall from the device.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MAXXAIR ETS
Type of Device
MATTRESS, AIR FLOTATION, ALTERNATING PRESSURE
Manufacturer (Section D)
ARJOHUNTLEIGH, INC.
4958 stout drive
san antonio TX 78219
Manufacturer (Section G)
ARJOHUNTLEIGH, INC.
4958 stout drive
san antonio TX 78219
Manufacturer Contact
justyna kielbowska
ks. wawrzyniaka 2
komorniki 62-05-2
PL   62-052
883337089
MDR Report Key15759324
MDR Text Key307730664
Report Number3007420694-2022-00182
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FNM
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Nurse
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 12/05/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received11/09/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Other
Device Model Number47129
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received10/14/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient SexMale
-
-