Manufacturer¿s ref.No: (b)(4).Information regarding patient identifier, date of birth, weight, race, and ethnicity were not provided.The initial reporter phone: (b)(6).The initial reporter email address was not available / reported.[conclusion]: the healthcare professional reported that an intra-procedure thrombus occurred during a vascular stent placement procedure performed on the 58-year-old female patient who suffered from basilar artery stenosis.The patient underwent stent dilation for intracranial stenosis.During the procedure, a 4mm x 23mm enterprise 2 stent (encr402312 / 7107635) was placed from the right posterior cerebral artery to the basilar artery.When the stent was fully opened, severe ischemia occurred in the stent, and the entire posterior cerebral artery was not visualized.Since the stent had been completely released and could not be removed, only medications could be administered for the endovascular treatment.Finally, the distal end of the vessel was still not visualized, and the procedure was deemed completed.It was reported that the procedure was delayed for approximately one (1) hour.At the time of the complaint initiation, the patient was still in a coma.Procedural imaging was included in the complaint for review.The procedural image included in the complaint was reviewed by senior medical affairs director ¿ dr.(b)(6), on (b)(6) 2022.The assessment reads as follows: the description provided highlights a problem with an enterprise stent in the basilar artery.The occurrence of clot in a stent is not uncommon but obviously an unwanted complication.There is no description of the pre-operative treatment with dual antiplatelet medication, nor is mentioned if heparin was administered.The reason for the narrowing of the basilar artery (vasospasm, icad, dissection) is not clear from the description.Based on the single image that is provided, the enterprise looks opened, the distal markers are visible.Clotting in this situation can be secondary to numerous causes such as: 1) no premedication, 2) inadequate response to premedication, 3) heparin induced thormocytopenia, 4) patient related coagulation disturbance, 5) refractory icad with stent narrowing, 6) cheese-grating of a soft plaque, 7) platelet adherence to the stent or 8) other causes.A distinction cannot be made on the basis of the available information.If additional information is provided at a later date the review can be reopened and assessed for its impact on the above analysis.Physician name and date reviewed: (b)(6) md, (b)(6) 2022 based on complaint information, the device remains implanted and is thus not available for evaluation.Lake region medical performed a review of the device history records relative to the manufacturing, inspection, and packaging of the lot 7107635.The history record indicates this product was final inspection tested at lake region medical and was determined to be acceptable.Product analysis cannot be conducted as the product was not returned for analysis.No determination of causes and possible contributing factors could be made.As such, the investigation will be closed.Stenosis of stented segment is a well-known potential adverse event following stent implantation and is listed in the enterprise 2 instructions for use (ifu) as such.The act of stent implantation produces intended damage to the intima of the vessel wall in order to remodel the wall and reestablish patency of the vessel.The disruption of the intimal layers triggers the immune system to heal the damaged areas, thus activating the clotting mechanism as well as the inflammatory response.The combination of inflammatory response and clotting cascade can lead to thrombus formation.The enterprise 2 vascular reconstruction device (vrd) is intended for use with occlusive devices in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms.It is not intended for use as a stand-alone device, i.E., without subsequent coil embolization of the aneurysm.This stent was used off-label for the treatment of an intracranial basilar artery stenosis.Since the cerebral thrombosis required medical intervention, had led to prolongation of the surgery and appears to have led to the comatose state of the patient, the event meets mdr reporting criteria with the classification of ¿serious injury.¿ there is no indication that the enterprise malfunctioned or that the event is related to the device design or manufacturing process.Based on the review of the manufacturing documentation, there is no indication that the event is related to the device manufacturing process.As part of the post market surveillance program, information from this complaint is trended for statistical signals and corrective / preventive action may be triggered at a later time.Since there was no evidence to suggest the event was related to a manufacturing or design issue, no corrective actions will be taken at this time.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by cerenovus, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, cerenovus, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Missing information from this report is identified as blank; this information was not provided in the reported event or available at the time of report submission.The manufacturer will submit a supplemental report if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.Additional information will be submitted within 30 days of receipt.
|
The healthcare professional reported that an intra-procedure thrombus occurred during a vascular stent placement procedure performed on the 58-year-old female patient who suffered from basilar artery stenosis.The patient underwent stent dilation for intracranial stenosis.During the procedure, a 4mm x 23mm enterprise 2 stent (encr402312 / 7107635) was placed from the right posterior cerebral artery to the basilar artery.When the stent was fully opened, severe ischemia occurred in the stent, and the entire posterior cerebral artery was not visualized.Since the stent had been completely released and could not be removed, only medications could be administered for the endovascular treatment.Finally, the distal end of the vessel was still not visualized, and the procedure was deemed completed.It was reported that the procedure was delayed for approximately one (1) hour.At the time of the complaint initiation, the patient was still in a coma.Procedural imaging was included in the complaint for review.
|