It was reported that the procedure was to treat the distal superficial femoral artery.During removal of the emboshield nav6 filter, resistance was noted with the anatomy, and the filter was unable to be pulled back in the retrieval catheter.It was then decided to pull the filter all the way up to the common femoral artery where the procedural sheath was and it was attempted to pull the filter into the sheath.However, once removed, it was noted that the filter membrane appeared to be missing.Via imaging it was noted the membrane remained in the anatomy and thus decided to be stented up against the common femoral wall.A final angiogram was performed and showed normal bloodflow throughout the leg.There was no adverse patient sequela and no clinically significant delay.No additional information was provided.
|
Visual analysis was performed on the returned device.The reported difficult to remove was not confirmed due to the condition of the returned unit.The reported material separation of the filtration element was confirmed.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no other similar complaints reported from this lot.Based on the reported event description and analysis of the returned unit, the resistance during removal and separation of the filtration membrane resulting in unexpected medical intervention to embed the filter membrane against the common femoral wall appears to be due to circumstances of the procedure.It may be possible that the filtration element was carrying an excessive embolic load resulting in resistance during the attempt to retract the filter into the retrieval catheter.As a result, the filter was pulled all the way up to the common femoral artery where the procedural sheath was.It is likely that during withdrawal of the expanded filter, interaction with the anatomy or sheath caused the filtration membrane to detach from the support structure resulting in additional intervention to embed the separated membrane against the vessel wall.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.
|