Model Number 101-9812 |
Device Problems
Difficult to Open or Close (2921); Material Integrity Problem (2978)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 11/07/2022 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during an indirect decompression spacer implant procedure, the spindle cap had broken off the implant after a few deployment applications.The physician attempted to open the spacer using the sagittal arc technique and the implant was properly connected to the inserter.The patients anatomy formed a tight space which contributed to the physician having difficulty opening the implant.The broken implant was removed and replaced with a smaller sized implant.There were no patient complications postoperatively.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device analysis performed on the returned indirect decompression spacer revealed that the spindle cap was completely sheared off from the implant body.This damage indicates that excessive force was likely used.Additionally, the damage signifies the break was due to deployment against resistance, such as bone, and/or manipulation of the position of the device by shifting the inserter.A product labeling review identified that the device was used per the instructions for use (ifu)/product label.Device breakage can occur when used with forced deployment and is noted within the ifu as a potential complication associated with use of the device.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during an indirect decompression spacer implant procedure, the spindle cap had broken off the implant after a few deployment applications.The physician attempted to open the spacer using the sagittal arc technique and the implant was properly connected to the inserter.The patients anatomy formed a tight space which contributed to the physician having difficulty opening the implant.The broken implant was removed and replaced with a smaller sized implant.There were no patient complications postoperatively.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|