The user facility reported a potential coronary perforation, there was no angiographic evidence during the case.The doctor performed a percutaneous coronary intervention (pci) of the mid lad over a izanai 180 cm wire.The patient's blood pressure dropped significantly.After assessing the patient, the doctor believed the bleed to be into the pericardium.A pericardiocentesis was performed to drain the fluid.The patient became stable and was released.The doctor does not deem this to be caused by a defect of the wire.The wire did not separate or malfunction in anyway.The patient was in stable condition.The procedure outcome was a success.The event occurred intra-operative.Pericardiocentesis was required.Additional information was received on (b)(6) 2022: there was no angiographic evidence of an incident.The patient coded a few hours after the procedure.A needle was used to drain the fluid out of the pericardium.The physician stated the incident could have only been caused by a wire perforation.A boston science balloon and stent were used.
|